Apologies for disappearing for a while there, busy mumming and working etc. But unless the thread gets denier-flooded, it looks like it could be a long slow burner chat anyway.
PhoenixJasmine - in my experience on mumsnet (around 4 years), I've found feminism to be routinely discussed in many different conversations, not just on the Feminism board which has 5 sub-pages, of one; 'Feminism Chat' having 189 threads in it.
Yet climate change, the thing that will probably fuck about with our lives and most definitely fuck our childrens lives - tumbleweeds. Feminism in a post-stable-climate world, that's an interesting and depressing thing to think about. I have a feeling that hard won rights and general civil liberties will go once the instability of mass migration and resource depletion kicks in, it will be back to survival of the fittest, and by fittest I mean strongest and most violent.
Oh wait I've just re-read your post and maybe you meant the flooding with non-data?
Smashedinductionhob - thanks for that, will have a read.
MercyMyJewels - no, not read that but I am reading Rebecca Solnit's Hope In The Dark which is pretty good so far.
amicissimma - I totally don't mind a differing view, in fact I would love to be convinced that human driven climate change isn't happening but no-one has ever shown me anything that doesn't stink of Koch funding and their ilk. And it's never a conversation, it's just being droned at for pages and pages and pages and pages of cherry picked weirdness interspersed with arrogant calls to 'wake up sheeple!!'. Look at any Cif thread in The Guardian about pretty much any environmental issue. If the thread is open, it's swamped by just utter bonkersness. Like, people send death threats to climate scientist!! Death threats. WTAF. Shit, just being an environmental activist in a few countries will get you killed, 2015 saw 189 activist killed, 50 in Brazil alone. Not that I'm saying climate change deniers are killers but I am saying that when large money making extractive industries come up against opposition things can and do get really dirty.
Anyone got a theory about deniers?
Mine is that for some deniers, the threat of climate change is actually pretty plausible to them and deep inside they can see it and they get it but it's SO TERRIFYING and that to both acknowledge the cause and accept what humanity has to do to change the outcome would mean thinking in ways that is in fundamental opposition to their personal ideology and world view. So they grasp at anything that avoids that mind shift. Desperately, loudly and in ever more creative cognitive dissonant circles.
Anyway, I gotta go pick up my kid.. see you in this very quiet conversation soon.