Izzymac
I would be careful. can you prove that connection?
see this post from elswhere:
I don't think this in the least relevant and the original poster on 'mumsnet' should be careful of suggesting connections between companies where none are shown to exist. I would also like to know where the poster got this information from and how they have proved a connection.
Now, a quick check at Companies House (that the person posting the above misleading information on 'mumsnet' could and should have done) shows this:-
Co No: 02356384 The Lapland experience Ltd predates LNF by some 18 years and is dormant. The registered office is the same as Canterbury Travel Ltd - a reputable travel company as far as I can surmise. (Further background information below). Details of Co No: 02356384 here.
wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/76...00/compdetails
Now, Co No 00995587 Canterbury Travel (London) Ltd, details at:
wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/ba...a3/compdetails
was incorporated some 38 years ago.
It appears that Canterbury Travel use the term 'The Lapland Experience' as a trading style. Their website is clear and complies with publication requirements (unlike anything Mears did) and I do not suspect them to be involved in LNF in any way whatsoever.
It is quite possible, if not probable, that Canterbury Travel brought the company 'The Lapland Experience Ltd' to either use the company in the future or to avoid confusion with other companies. This is perfectly legitimate and in fact a good working practice in company formation.
I think we should ignore this misleading information from someone on 'mumsnet', but if the poster is also here I would suggest that they withdraw any accusation of connection between 'The Lapland Experience' and LNF unless they can prove it in court. To accuse a company of connection with a company which is going through liquidation and that has a number of questions hanging over it is not only opening the poster to action against them in the civil courts, but also shows them to be extremely ignorant of company law and structure, and to speak out from a point of ignorance is folly of the greatest form.