I find this funny... as pointed out above this tread has already been done before but with almost entirely different outcome.
People their saying £1-£2k easy and now on this thread theres some kind of faux outrage and competition to spend the smallest % possible.
I HIGHLY doubt anyone here is really only spending £100-£200 on ALL of xmas unless you have pretty much no responsabilities to anyone (£100 is less than the amount our uncoupled childless siblings who go to other people houses for dinner spend just on their parents, niece and nephews).
I am low income, on these thread Im always at the lower end of peoples spending and I spend £500-£550 on xmas (presents for 3 kids, 1 partner, 5 family members and dinner for 5 people including the extra little bits like advent calanders, wrapping paper etc...) completely budget out as I cant afford to be going wild and that is 5% of my income (I only learned about the 5% thing on the other thread, just turns out to be correct) as I work part time.
So many people on the other thread said £1-£2k (no reason to believe they are lying) and at 5% that would say they had incomes of £20-£40k which is probably about average income for a single full time employed person to a full time employed couple here so also totally believable to me.
People saying they spend £100-£200 assuming an average UK income (£30k) are spending like 0.5% of their annual income on xmas, that doesnt sound believable though that sound like you just want to 'win' at saying your cheapest.