This baffles me. As long as it's not causing financial strain, just get what they ask for??
Not a stealth boast (as you will see by second statement) when DS was very little he asked for a pony, so I got an old rocking horse completely restored, which was £'000 completely hand designed by us and will be a family heirloom...he was thrilled. The subsequent year, he asked for a tea cup and a worm. He got a little cup with his initial on, and a slinky worm which together was £8...he was thrilled.
The concept of allocating a budget to reach I find completely backwards to what Christmas is all about. See what they genuinely want, and if it's in budget, great. If it's under budget, why try and find extra that they haven't asked for when you're already getting what will make them happy?
This year, DS, much older now, has asked for Lego Architecture, which thanks to the amazing bargain thread I've picked up two big sets for £85 total. He's asked for a globe jigsaw, so that's another £15 I guess. With his stocking (novelty/small items totalling around £25) that's him done. He'll get enough from the rest of the family.
Baby twins, again from bargain thread are getting a toot toot castle, some Duplo, a microphone and a singalong seahorse. £60 all together. Maybe a character toy in a stocking as well, maybe not. Plus of course all the stuff they'll get from family too.
I don't see, £60 doesn't sound a lot, I'd better bulk that up. I see, I've been really savvy and got exactly what they'll love for £30 per child, what a result.