Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Christmas

From present ideas to party food, find all your Christmas inspiration here.

Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas - Judy Garland version vs all the inferior copies

9 replies

toomuchtooold · 26/11/2018 06:47

Every year when the Christmas songs come on the radio, I'll eventually hear the opening bars of whatever is the latest cover version of Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas, and I will be disappointed. This is the : the lyrics go

^Once again as in olden days
Happy golden days of yore
Faithful friends who are dear to us
Will be near to us once more

One day soon we all will be together
If the fates allow
Until then we'll have to middle through somehow

So have yourself a merry little Christmas now^

But the cover will inevitably have

^ Here we are as in olden days
Happy golden days of yore
Faithful friends who are dear to us
Gather near to us once more
Through the years we all will be together
If the fates allow^

And then, because the bit about getting through would now make no sense:
^ Hang a shining star upon the highest bough
So have yourself a merry little Christmas now^

Is it just me that thinks the first version is just tons better than the second? The sadness in it, the reference to friends lost or far away, makes it much more poignant than the second version, where all the narrative tension is taken out and it's just this sweet little song about how nice it is to be with people you love. Or am I missing something lovely in the second version?

OP posts:
elQuintoConyo · 26/11/2018 06:51

Oh most definitely the original is best. And she had such a rich beautiful voice. Most people singing it now sound so reedy!

Badtasteflump · 26/11/2018 10:06

Ha I'm with you OP. And Meet Me in St Louis is one of my favourite films to watch in the lead up to Christmas.

I think any song Judy Garland has sung sounds pretty feeble and just wrong when somebody else tries to cover it - I'm thinking particularly of all those awful, breathy versions of Somewhere over the Rainbow Shock

elQuintoConyo · 26/11/2018 10:40

Meet Me in St Louis, Louis
Meet me at the fair...

Why do i not have this on DVD?

Badtasteflump · 26/11/2018 12:12

Ooh Elquinto you can get it in HD on blue ray now you know Grin

Badtasteflump · 26/11/2018 12:13

Or blu ray - which I suspect is the correct spelling Blush

shirleyschmidt · 26/11/2018 12:35

Totally agree, the original is so much more emotional!

elQuintoConyo · 26/11/2018 22:37

On bluey? Gosh our dvd player is 15 years old and still going strong after 4 house moves Shock perhaps i should put bluey player on my Amazon wishlist, too!

The last time i saw Meet Me in St Louis was on VHS - holy cheeses i'm old GrinGrinGrin

Badtasteflump · 27/11/2018 11:04

El I would do, honestly! When you watch a real old classic on blu ray, like this film, the difference in quality is amazing!

ChickenFriedMice · 27/11/2018 12:16

I highly recommend the Tori Amos version for breathy and bonkers pronunciation Grin

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread