Basically I'm wondering if there is a non controlling, non-rude, non-grabby, non-Grinch-like, way to get our relatives to tone down the amount that they buy for our DS, who is 7.
I've been having a bit of a sort out today and I'm finding toys and games that haven't been played with since the day he got them, if at all. It seems like such a waste and we are running out of places to put them. We have one particularly generous relative who fills an actual sack with toys for DS, and while I really appreciate their generosity, it's far too much.
I know I could give them away to charity, but the sack-giving relative likes to follow up with DS on how he got on with particular gifts and I know they'd take offence if they found out the gift had been passed on and DS wouldn't want to lie to them.
To make things harder, DS is the worlds worst actor. He's very polite and always says thank you for his gifts, but you can tell when he doesn't like something and that doesn't go over very well at Christmas.
I just feel like every year £100s are just pissed down the drain for no reason. It's not even as if DS particularly enjoys it as he just gets overwhelmed and retreats into himself a bit, particularly by sack relative. Also, in some ways I'd really rather that certain relatives kept back a bit more money to spend on themselves as they aren't exactly flush.
So I'm wondering if it would be rude/grabby/entitled etc to do one or a mixture of the following?
a) Ask for contributions towards something that DS would actually use. Can't think of anything right now, so lets say roller skates for the sake of argument.
b) Ask for book tokens/Kindle vouchers. DS loves reading and I think he would get a lot of use out of a gift like that.
c) Ask for contributions to/tickets to events. Might even be something we could do together with the gift givers, I could pick specific events that they would be interested in.
Or do I just put up and shut up?