My 3 month old son has severe reflux for which he has been admitted to hospital twice and is under the care of a consultant paediatrician.
He was initially prescribed Ranitidine, domperidone and gaviscon. When that didn't work, the consultant switched Ranitidine and Gavison for a special formula for babies with reflux, Enfamil AR. This has reduced his vomiting and he is not in as much discomfort. The consultant gave us a letter to give to our GP with her findings and the prescribed course of treatment. I had no problems with my GP at the time and he happily prescribed the milk.
Two weeks ago we moved out of the area. The consultant wants my son to remain under her care as he also has ongoing heart problems that need further investigation. I am happy to do this as the care from her has been excellent.
I took my son to our new GP yesterday as we are running out of milk. I took the letter from the consultant with her findings, course of treatment, etc. with me. The GP read it but is refusing to prescribe the milk on the grounds of cost. She has given me a weeks supply but has said this will be a one-off. Her argument is that his milk is a food-stuff and not a medicine, which I dispute: it is necessary for the management of his condition and without it he will end up back in hospital. And as a 3 month old baby, it is his only source of sustenance; it is not as if I can substitute it for another food. I argued with her for a while before leaving and it was left that the surgery may make some contribution but I will also have to contribute towards the of his milk. I wondered if this is normal practice? I've left a message with my son's consultant asking for her support but she is on leave at the moment and I don't know what to do.