Not been on for a while, and searching old messages saw you had 'eye knowledge' :-)
dw has I think fairly pronounced astigmatism (sorry, no prescription to hand), has done for 20+ years.
I have very mild, only beginning last few years.
dd was 1 month prem, IUGR, but is a 100% fine and dandy 3yo.
As she was prem, they have done one or two routine eye tests over the years (all apparently fine), but at the last test they suggested a dilation session so they could have a good look at the back of her eyes, establish a baseline to measure for any astigmatism which may be present. I've confirmed with a private optometrist (have I got these titles right ? !) that this is indeed sensible / advised / only way to look at this portion of the eye etc....
She is due to have the test tomorrow.
I am wary though of putting her through something potentially 'unnecessary', and creating a negative association with things opthalmic IYSWIM...
Is it 'best practice' to test those theoretically at increased risk of developing astigmatism ? Should she be tested so young or could I safely stall a few years ?
If something is found, does treating it this early (presumably with glasses) slow down / reverse / correct the defect or just provide better vision ?
Regardless of the outcome, I presume it will be suggested we get her tested at regular intervals - probably every year or two. Would you suggest that is sensible, even if the test is somewhat intrusive / uncomfortable ? If astigmatism is 'caught early' does treatment strategy change or prognosis improve ?
TIA for any comments / experience from people who've needed the test for their little ones.