Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Children's health

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Why isn't child obesity classed as neglect?

175 replies

dinklu · 03/03/2025 19:20

(Setting aside medical conditions that may contribute to weight gain.)

If a child is severely underweight due to a lack of proper nutrition, it is often seen as neglect. But when a child is significantly overweight due to consistently poor diet and lack of exercise, it is not typically viewed in the same way. Why is that?

Is it because there aren't enough resources or support for parents? Or is it simply not recognised as a form of neglect in the same way malnutrition is? Curious to hear other perspectives.

OP posts:
WaitingForMojo · 04/03/2025 11:55

Nothatgingerpirate · 04/03/2025 11:03

Okay then, how DID they do it these thirty, forty years ago?
The parents, I mean. There was still work, but no technology, no tablets etc.
Genuine question.
Glad I'm more or less retired from society, which I understand less and less.
No children, no obesity, only father had a beer belly.
Just a little joke.

In the 1980’s, we ate oven chips every day with a burger, fishfingers or sausages.
The most fruit and veg we ate was some frozen peas instead of baked beans on occasion.

There were overweight children (and underweight ones) back then too.

wherearemypastnames · 04/03/2025 12:04

Because cheap is good - it keeps benefits and wages down because at least no one is starving

Because cheap is good - leaves cash left for other things

Because expecting people to behave responsibly is at complete odds with the fact that advertising works - or no one would pay to do it

The food industry is manipulating people and profiteering on the back of peoples poor choices -choices that lead to ill health and huge costs on society to find the NHS

Because expecting people to be robots is denying the frailties of being human in the complex capitalist society we have created

So yes it is partly and significantly not just the fault of the parent who is trying to get by

Scrubberdubber · 04/03/2025 12:07

Some kids are just a little chunky but in extreme cases I agree with you. I know one woman who's toddler is MASSIVE still she regularly gives him whole family bags of haribos I honestly don't understand it, she has eyes how can she not see how big he is?

PoppyBaxter · 04/03/2025 12:12

Because fat kids typically have fat parents, and I guess it hits too much of a nerve to inform those fat parents that they've substantially overfed their child.

Nothatgingerpirate · 04/03/2025 12:16

WaitingForMojo · 04/03/2025 11:55

In the 1980’s, we ate oven chips every day with a burger, fishfingers or sausages.
The most fruit and veg we ate was some frozen peas instead of baked beans on occasion.

There were overweight children (and underweight ones) back then too.

Far fewer, though.
My parents were pretty absent, too, as per PPs, but somehow we didn't get the chance to become overweight.

babasaclover · 04/03/2025 12:16

WilderHawthorn · 04/03/2025 11:00

I took my children to soft play over the weekend, most of the kids are tearing around, slim and energetic. Parents a variety of shapes and sizes. Two families were there where the parents were huge, and so were their kids. The little girl had rings around her stomach from how tight the leggings were & fat rolls, she can only have been 5-6. The older boys were both bought massive milkshakes with cream and marshmallows which were £5.95 each. They hardly moved, just sat and ate constantly.

This wasn't a cheap place, so I don't buy the financial argument, the 'easy' option for the parents was to buy them crap and feed them junk to get to that size. It's disgusting and I judged them hard.

I'm genuinely sad for those children that is neglect

beadystar · 04/03/2025 12:17

It's complicated, possibly has a good bit to do with social deprivation. I live in a naice area and you don't really see overweight primary age kids. Some boys can be a bit plump around the end of primary school but then they grow six inches. I work in a poor part of the city centre, and now that's where you consistently see fat little kids with fat mums. The type given a phone in a buggy that they're plonked in until about six. The poor kids are in that pattern before they even know it. Another thing I've noticed around town is that teenage girls are generally bigger than we were. Is this 'body positivity' or celebrating being 'thicc'?

PassivAggressivHaus · 04/03/2025 12:18

@Cerialkiller the predisposition to obesity it's about 70% genetic
Why has the percentage of obese children increased?

It's down to what people eat and how much of it they eat.

UPF is a factor. The wheat-based typical western diet is not ideal. Portion sizes have increased.

PassivAggressivHaus · 04/03/2025 12:27

@WilderHawthorn , I don't buy the fresh food is too expensive either. The supermarket loss leaders are things like carrots and milk. An egg costs about 27p.

One thing I've noticed is that fat people and slim people seem to eat different foods and in different amounts.

Bbq1 · 04/03/2025 12:37

Honon · 04/03/2025 09:54

Not every problem can be solved through child protection processes. Childhood obesity is at epidemic levels, there aren't the resources or solutions within social services to tackle a national crisis.

It's also not as simple as blaming the family. Far more children are obese than in the past, are we saying parents are significantly more neglectful than they used to be? No, the reasons are more complex than that, to do with poverty, cheap food, easy access.

Malnutrition is different as it's much more to do with problems within an individual family, there's no national-level pattern.

A child living with the effects of food poverty can be simultaneously overweight and also suffering from malnutrition.

tallhotpinkflamingo · 04/03/2025 13:14

Nothatgingerpirate · 04/03/2025 12:16

Far fewer, though.
My parents were pretty absent, too, as per PPs, but somehow we didn't get the chance to become overweight.

Speak for yourself, I was overweight my whole childhood.

Horsedriver · 04/03/2025 13:25

The greed which causes childhood obesity is of the ‘Big Food’ companies who maximise profits by selling UPF fake food with few nutrients, not the families who buy this stuff.

We are then programmed to seek more and more food to get the nutrients we need in a vicious cycle which suits ‘Big Food’ but leads to malnourishment and obesity which usually co-exist in such children.

Supermarkets are the enablers.

Eating non-UPF is no more expensive as there’s no need for all the snack foods etc as meals are far more satisfying.

But ‘Big Food’ is a very powerful global industry with lobbyists and friends in high places.

SemperIdem · 04/03/2025 14:04

ERthree · 04/03/2025 11:08

30 or 40 years ago many households only had one working adult or if the second parent worked it was part time, so there was plenty of time available to walk the children to and from school and to make a meal from scratch. We have made this mess.

I think this is a bit of a myth. I was a school child in the 90’s and none of my peers had a stay at home parent, all the parents worked.

wherearemypastnames · 04/03/2025 14:13

Children walked to school by themselves from age around 8 where I grew up because both parents worked

It's in the food - it was too boring so overeating wasn't a pleasure

and also compare the size of an 1979 dinner plate to a standard plate today

wherearemypastnames · 04/03/2025 14:15

Eating UPF is cheaper though - calorie per pound you can get 2 to 3 times more for the money - and most people are not eating twice as many calories as needed so a healthy diet will cost them more

User7288339 · 04/03/2025 14:22

It's very difficult - and easy to judge and point fingers if you haven't been there.

The youngest of my 3 children has a really disproportionately big tummy at age 9, and I have to get her age 12-13 stuff to fit it. She's also quite tall (152cm) but has gained weight in the last few years and is overweight, possibly obese.

I've raised her the same as my other two children.

I see myself in her - the sensory seeking food behaviour and lack of awareness of hunger signals.

I try everything I can to get her to consume less calories/eat good stuff. But it is hard when she will help herself when my back is turned, plus I am very conscious (maybe too conscious) not to make a thing of it and damage her self esteem as that's the cycle I got into.

ButterflyBitch · 04/03/2025 14:24

I work in a school and there are at least 4 kids who are morbidly obese and have been since reception. There are many others who are overweight to some degree. Most of these kids have packed lunches which are filled with numerous sugary snacks, crisps and things like sausage rolls. They rarely have anything healthy in them. I feel incredibly sorry for them.

PassivAggressivHaus · 04/03/2025 14:27

No, the reasons are more complex than that, to do with poverty, cheap food, easy access.
Lack of portion control, endless snacking, (cheap) junk food.

Children walked to school by themselves from age around 8 where I grew up because both parents worked
We walked home and it was over two miles. We walked everywhere. Both my parents worked.
It's in the food - it was too boring so overeating wasn't a pleasure
We didn't eat between meals. The food was a bit bland an boring.
and also compare the size of an 1979 dinner plate to a standard plate today
I can't remember of the actual plates were smaller, but food was mainly 'meat an two veg' not pasta, pizza etc. Bread was from the local bakery not sliced in a bag.
If we were thirsty, we had a glass of water. A takeaway was a rare treat. We hardly ever ate out. We didn't have diet drinks.
People didn't wander about with coffee cups or cans of pop, or food.

There weren't many fat kids.

LionalRichTea · 04/03/2025 14:30

Another factor contributing to childhood and adult obesity is the scrapping of subjects like home economics and cookery in schools - I know some do it but it's often barely anything. Nutrition is bolted onto science and the county have lost cooking skills.

When I was at school in the late 80's we ALL had to do at least 2 years of it! Where we had large cookery facilities etc - many don't have the skills or confidence to make the most of offers on fresh ingredients, which are cheap, and pay over the odds for ready style meals.

I remember mutterings of schools cutting down on "soft subjects" like cookery, such a short sighted thing to do!

When i was at primary school we had little ovens and we regularly cooked too, so not just secondary school.

ERthree · 04/03/2025 14:35

SemperIdem · 04/03/2025 14:04

I think this is a bit of a myth. I was a school child in the 90’s and none of my peers had a stay at home parent, all the parents worked.

My eldest is heading towards 40 i didn't know one mother that worked during the day and full daycare was almost unheard of unheard of outside London because there was no call for it and really only became readily available everywhere in the late 90s, so yes that was about 30 years ago.

wherearemypastnames · 04/03/2025 14:37

Children stayed with grandparents usually rather than paid childcare who kicked you out to play outside

Or mothers worked around childcare - teaching, shop assistant, bar maid

Lavenderflower · 04/03/2025 14:37

ERthree · 04/03/2025 14:35

My eldest is heading towards 40 i didn't know one mother that worked during the day and full daycare was almost unheard of unheard of outside London because there was no call for it and really only became readily available everywhere in the late 90s, so yes that was about 30 years ago.

My mum worked. most of my peers mum worked.

Newmumhere40 · 04/03/2025 14:38

dinklu · 03/03/2025 19:20

(Setting aside medical conditions that may contribute to weight gain.)

If a child is severely underweight due to a lack of proper nutrition, it is often seen as neglect. But when a child is significantly overweight due to consistently poor diet and lack of exercise, it is not typically viewed in the same way. Why is that?

Is it because there aren't enough resources or support for parents? Or is it simply not recognised as a form of neglect in the same way malnutrition is? Curious to hear other perspectives.

Could not agree more. ...it's so sad to see.

wherearemypastnames · 04/03/2025 14:39

In 1970 50% married women worked

It's now 73%

So it's probably class and area dependent what you grew up with

Newmumhere40 · 04/03/2025 14:40

wherearemypastnames · 04/03/2025 14:15

Eating UPF is cheaper though - calorie per pound you can get 2 to 3 times more for the money - and most people are not eating twice as many calories as needed so a healthy diet will cost them more

I hate this argument it's total bullshit and such an excuse for laziness. Healthy food is super cheap!!! Put a load of sweet potatoes on your plate!!

Swipe left for the next trending thread