Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Children's health

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Slush puppies dangerous for children under four

15 replies

IndependentEventually · 31/07/2024 17:47

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c725pzqzdgno

"The Food Standards Agency advises drinks with glycerol are not suitable for children under age four – but it is not mandatory for companies to print this on food labels."

Arla Agnew

Toddler 'turned grey and passed out' after drinking Slush Puppie

Arla Agnew's blood sugars plummeted after having the drink which is unsuitable for children under four.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c725pzqzdgno

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Cormoran · 03/08/2024 05:46

Next to the ingredients , it does say not suitable for four and under.
The amount of shit in it is shocking.

Slush puppies dangerous for children under four
MoosesOnGooses · 03/08/2024 05:48

Who would do this anyway? Like, why does it even need a warning? Parents should use their common sense. Of course this isn’t suitable.

My 3.5 year old has only ever had water and it’ll stay that way as long as possible, same with my 1 year old.

Edingril · 03/08/2024 05:52

Surely it comes under school of commensense?

Thatsnotmynose · 03/08/2024 05:56

MoosesOnGooses · 03/08/2024 05:48

Who would do this anyway? Like, why does it even need a warning? Parents should use their common sense. Of course this isn’t suitable.

My 3.5 year old has only ever had water and it’ll stay that way as long as possible, same with my 1 year old.

There's a difference between a drink having a list of ingredients that might not be wise for a child in terms of nutrition Vs a drink that will actually poison your child.

DancefloorAcrobatics · 03/08/2024 06:01

Just keep replacing sugar with shit created in a laboratory.

Meadowfinch · 03/08/2024 06:20

Why would anyone give that rubbish to their dcs anyway? Or drink it themselves? In no way does it come into the category of healthy eating.

Just look at all those lovely wholesome ingredients !!

BertieBotts · 03/08/2024 06:32

Well, I didn't know that, and I quite possibly would have let my 2/nearly 3yo have a slurp out of a drink like that - in fact I definitely have because we all got them on holiday last summer! I can't remember if he had his own or shared, but we wouldn't have left him out as the youngest.

I would have seen it as being similar to ice cream, which is a perfectly normal summer treat, no need for pearl clutching. I wouldn't give it to them for breakfast! But on a day out it wouldn't have occurred to me that a small amount of something like that would be a problem. In fact I've never come across that packaging pictured, but I probably would have assumed that the warning referred to the lid being a choking hazard.

TheHeadOfTheHouse · 03/08/2024 06:38

I had no idea about this, I just thought it was strong, iced juice.

MotherOfCrocodiles · 03/08/2024 06:51

@MoosesOnGooses both your kids are toddlers

Once they go to school the older one will be given sweets and crap at parties (and indeed by the school). At that point Pandora's box is open and the younger one will want such things too.

Certainly my younger kids got access to sweets, chocolate and bad TV at a younger age than my oldest

BendingSpoons · 03/08/2024 06:54

There is a soft play place near us that does parties. One of the menus they offer comes with a slushy for each child. They potentially have parties for 3yos as the soft play is suitable for that age.

It's not something I would want my child drinking, but as others say, I would assume it was safe, although unhealthy, and would allow it as a one-off at a party. My kids have tried them at parties and disliked them so not drunk much (and been over 4), but it is worrying to be that dangerous.

MoosesOnGooses · 03/08/2024 07:10

MotherOfCrocodiles · 03/08/2024 06:51

@MoosesOnGooses both your kids are toddlers

Once they go to school the older one will be given sweets and crap at parties (and indeed by the school). At that point Pandora's box is open and the younger one will want such things too.

Certainly my younger kids got access to sweets, chocolate and bad TV at a younger age than my oldest

My eldest goes to preschool, she already attends lots of events where they try to hand out unsuitable sweeties and fruit shoots.

Nothing wrong with chocolate, biscuits and sweets that aren’t choking hazards. All food in moderation.

I don’t allow her to have sweets like lollies or hard boiled sweets, marshmallows or popcorn, as they are all high choking risks. I explain they are for older children, and when she does turn 5 and is at school she will be old enough for them.

Same with fruit shoots/juice/fizzy drinks.

Also I don’t want my 1.5 year old having chocolate, sweets, ice cream etc yet. So she doesn’t. That doesn’t stop my eldest having them.

It’s called parenting your children 🤷‍♀️

TrustPenguins · 03/08/2024 07:13

Cormoran · 03/08/2024 05:46

Next to the ingredients , it does say not suitable for four and under.
The amount of shit in it is shocking.

It should say 'Not suitable for human consumption'.

The amount of crap that is sold as food or drink - with a lot of it targeted at children - is shocking.

MouseofCommons · 03/08/2024 07:18

I didn't know this and I'm usually pretty hot on nutrition. (I'm not sure my kids ever had many slush puppies and certainly not as little kids).

FanofLeaves · 03/08/2024 07:30

They have these in a big machine at the local trampoline place- my almost three year old asks every time and I’ve always said no (and he has fruit shoots semi regularly) partly due to the fact they are yet more expense on top of an already expensive activity but I might have given in for a treat at some point, because I didn’t know this, although obviously assumed they were full of crap. Worrying how easily they can be bought for small children.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page