When I was 13 I was diagnosed with coeliac disease.
I have always been asymptomatic in the sense that I've never felt unwell by eating gluten. It was only found by accident in my DM who was experiencing unrelated abdominal pain, and doctors then advised to test my DB and I as it is hereditary - I was positive he was negative.
I now have 2 DC. Eldest is almost 3 and youngest is newborn.
DH and I have agreed we want to test the children for coeliac disease. We can't test the baby until she's older as she will need to have gluten present in her diet for the test to work but think it's right to test the nearly 3 year old.
We know it's little to "voluntarily" put her through a blood test and potential endoscopy but think given she has a first degree relative with coeliac it's better to know in case we need to make changes to her diet, plus it will entitle her to further protective medicines like immunisations that are routinely offered for those with certain autoimmune conditions.
My wobble is because when we mentioned this to MIL she made a really negative face and said "oooh goodness such a lot to subject a small child to" - she's right, especially if DC needs the endoscopy to confirm. I know she will cry at the blood test. I know she may well be asymptomatic like me and not understand yet why she suddenly has to watch what she's eating.
Are we doing this too early? Being over cautious? We were so certain we were doing the right thing but this really shocked and negative reaction is making me question whether we are subjecting DC to something that will scare her unnecessarily.
Has anyone else done this sort of thing this young? Advice very much appreciated!