Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Children's health

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Did anyones child recieve phototherapy?

10 replies

Lullaby88 · 19/03/2021 20:15

My baby had jaundice when she was born and was admitted into hospital to recieve phototherapy. Shes 4 now and iv read it can have some harmful side effects including childhood cancer risks. Does anyone know anything about this?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
paradyning · 19/03/2021 20:55

So you mean cancer from the light exposure??
If so, absolutely not. It's blue light. Not uvb. Tiny tiny amounts of uva. No cancer risk at all.

user1471530109 · 19/03/2021 20:58

I've also never heard this either. I had phototherapy as a newborn and my youngest had it for a couple of weeks in the NICU. It's been used for years (I'm 40).

ShowOfHands · 19/03/2021 20:59

I'm 40 and had phototherapy for months when I was 9 years old. Was told even then that the risk was tiny.

IaltagDhubh · 19/03/2021 21:02

Bollocks. My DD had phototherapy. She also had a childhood cancer. The two were not linked.

Lullaby88 · 19/03/2021 21:21

Thanks for that. Iv just read some reports online and studies saying theres an increased chance but its inconclusive.
I dont understand as sunlight that surely a lot of babies are exposed to in very hot countries would pose a much higher risk to cancers. Its all a bit confusing.

OP posts:
GordonettaBennett · 19/03/2021 21:32

What reports and studies? Are they proper medical studies, large samples, peer reviewed etc? Or just people sharing crap on social media?

Surely the likelihood/ risk of baby being very ill from NOT having the phototherapy is far far greater than the risk of them getting cancer from it?

Dingleydel · 19/03/2021 21:42

My baby had it. I’ve never heard of a risk but it seems a couple of studies have shown a very tiny increase in risk for a certain type of leukaemia. I think the authors were concerned about it being used as therapy to readily in infants that probably don’t need it. I don’t think the NHS would be giving out treatments without serious clinical need. I know my baby needed it and I’m sure yours did too. Its impossible to avoid all cancer risks. Our dc are sadly very likely exposed to far more carcinogens walking down the road to school/nursery every day. I really wouldn’t spend any time worry about this (and I’m a worrier).

Lullaby88 · 19/03/2021 22:32

Thanks, iv spent most my evening worrying but after reading all your comments i feel maybe these reports are just really trying to seek a link between the 2.

OP posts:
paradyning · 20/03/2021 07:54

@Lullaby88

Thanks for that. Iv just read some reports online and studies saying theres an increased chance but its inconclusive. I dont understand as sunlight that surely a lot of babies are exposed to in very hot countries would pose a much higher risk to cancers. Its all a bit confusing.
The spectrum of blue light phototherapy lamps is completely different to sunlight. The cancer causing wavelengths (uvb/a) are not present. Please don't worry. And if you are still worried ask your GP to explain or contact your local medical physics department at the hospital/region she was treated at. They should be able to explain further.
orzo15 · 12/11/2025 20:30

Hello, i have just come across this thread in the midst of me spiralling about my son having had phototherapy. Were you able to put your mind to rest about this op?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread