My 7 yo daughter developed a rash on her legs last week. It didn't disappear under a glass, but she had no other symptoms. We ummed and ahed a bit and took her to see the GP. They're a bit baffled, have basically told us to keep an eye on it any watch out for other symptoms.
Their main suspicion is HSP, which is a pretty rare thing for which my son was also tested when he was a toddler. Again, no other symptoms, and it went away again without further issues.
On both occasions, we've been told that this kind of rash without other symptoms is rare, and they're a bit astonished that both of our children have presented with it, given it is not generally familial. So I was wondering whether the fact they see it so rarely is down to the fact that most people wouldn't have taken a child in with just a rash and no other symptoms. Would you have taken your child in?