Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Children's health

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Back to school after vomiting bug

14 replies

juneau · 30/09/2012 11:37

DS1 had a vomiting bug yesterday. Today he is fine and eating and drinking well (albeit bland foods). The rules from the school clearly state that a child should stay at home until s/he's been okay for a full 48 hours, so that means he really shouldn't go to school tomorrow. However, DH thinks I'm being silly and that we should send him as if he's well today he should be fine tomorrow. WWYD?

OP posts:
Sirzy · 30/09/2012 11:39

If the rules say 48 hours then keep him home for 48 hours.

yousankmybattleship · 30/09/2012 11:40

No, you shouldn't send him tomorrow. I think most schools have the 48hr rule.

corblimeymadam · 30/09/2012 16:03

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

shushpenfold · 30/09/2012 16:05

48 hours is there fore a reason.......most notably demonstrated by my ds who was fine for 44 hours and then dramatically brought up the whole day's stuff in one go.....I could have sent him to school that day but didn't because of the rules. Your dh is being a twonk.

Dolallytats · 30/09/2012 16:19

No, you definitely should not send him to school. That would be unfair on your DS (if his body has not cleared the bug yet) and anyone else that comes into contact with him. The rules are there for a reason.

Finbert · 30/09/2012 16:22

Yep 48 hours as may still be contagious, it's to try and stop the spread to other children and staff. Would be unfair to send him in

hellhasnofurylikeahungrywoman · 30/09/2012 16:23

48 hours is 48 hours. It is set at that time to ensure the bug is clear of his system before he returns to school.

MrsJohnDeere · 30/09/2012 16:24

Don't send him tomorrow.

hellymelly · 30/09/2012 16:25

keep him at home. It is a risk to the rest of the class, he may well still be contagious. ( hospital said five days when I had a bug and wanted to visit ill mother, so schools are not being madly over-cautious with 48 hours).

moosemama · 30/09/2012 20:08

My ds was sent home with a vomiting bug last Monday. He went into school with no sign of being ill and was really poorly by mid morning. We later found out that he'd caught the bug off someone at a party the day before - so only a 24 hour incubation period.

We kept him off for 48 hours from the last time he was sick, plus an additional day and he seemed completely better. Then the evening before he was due to go back he was violently ill again.

The 48 hours is because children still spread the bug for up to 48 hours after cessation of symptoms, which is how these things spread like wildfire through schools.

It's important that everyone sticks to the 48 hour rule and particularly so for any children in his school who may be immune-compromised.

blondefriend · 30/09/2012 21:45

A parent at my children's nursery brought her son into nursery after being sick the previous day. It caused my son to be in hospital for 2 weeks. To say I wasn't amused was an understatement.

Badvoc · 30/09/2012 21:50

Your dh is being a twat.
Why should your son go in and potentially infect a whole class?
For the same of anther 24 hours?
For all you know there may be kids in the class with immunity/health issues.

dikkertjedap · 30/09/2012 22:10

As others have said, your son might not show any more symptoms, but in all likelihood he is still contagious.

Your DH is either ignorant or selfish.

blondefriend · 01/10/2012 21:16

Although I don't think you should send him in (see above comment) I don't think the comments about your DH are necessary. Sorry, I'm new here but that's a bit rude.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page