Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Children's health

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Does anyone understand eye tests?

6 replies

domesticsluttery · 06/08/2010 19:48

The DC had an eye test today.

She mentioned that they were all slightly longsighted, but that she didn't think it was causing them any problems at the moment. On their prescription forms it says:

DS1: SPH +0.25 (both L and R)
DS2: SPH +0.50 (both L and R)
DD: SPH +0.50 (both L and R)

I have googled and seen that this means longsightedness, but how much? Is it likely to cause them any problems in the future?

DD and DS1 don't have to go back for another 12 months, but DS2 has to go back in 6 months as he couldn't see some of the letters on the chart very well. He is also very colourblind, he stared blankly at most of the pages in the book of patterns.

Am just checking really that it is nothing to worry about. It wasn't mentioned at all at their last appointment 12 months ago.

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
bigstripeytiger · 06/08/2010 19:53

That isnt very long sighted, most people I know who are long sighted are in the +2 to +4 range.

How old is your DS2 - the ability to do those tests is I think age dependedent (I remember reading that before age 4 you cant be sure that they are colourblind)

MmeRedWhiteandBlueberry · 06/08/2010 19:57

0.25/0.5 - very mild correction. I don't think it necessarily means they will get worse. Normally, they become more short-sided with age, so should naturally become 20:20.

The long-sightedness is nothing to worry about at this stage (which is why they are recalled at 12months rather than 6). I would expect the colourblindness to be more of a concern.

domesticsluttery · 06/08/2010 20:10

DS2 is 6.

It has been pretty obvious since he was in nursery school that he couldn't differentiate between certain colours. We had his sight tested when he was 5 (which was suggested as the minimum age at which they could be sure) and this confirmed it. Colour blindness runs in our family, my brother has problems with the same colours as DS2 seems to.

I'm not sure that they can actually do anything about being colourblind though.

I'm glad that the long sightedness is nothing to worry about. I don't wear glasses and nor does DH so it's a whole new world!

OP posts:
TonariNoTotoro · 06/08/2010 20:12

Yes, 0.25 is very slightly longsighted (to give you an idea of how much, I'm -5.0 shortsighted and blind as a bat)

A lot of children's long-sightedness corrects itself as they grow, whereas if you are short-sighted as a child it only tends to get worse (so my optician told me anyway)

beammeupscotty · 06/08/2010 21:53

0.25 + is very mild. Mine is 7.25+ (also blind as a bat) - I had glasses around 10 yrs old Sad

BikeRunSki · 06/08/2010 22:10

Very mildly longsighted. Nothing to worry about there. I am -6.75 shortsighted in one eye, -5 in the other.

If if is any comfort, I have worked with 2 colour blind men. 1 was red/green colour blind, and it ed had never affected him. 1 was totally colour blind, and it had had some restriction on his career choice - he wanted to be an electrical engineer but had trouble differentiating between wires.

Both could drive and had matching clothes!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread