It was the 'extra psperwork' - or lack of it in Ofsted's opinion - that cost me an overall outstanding grade at my recent inspection, for a child who was 5yrs and 5mths at the point of inspection.
No reply to email - can't say am surprised.
Am not opposed to legislation - it's vital to ensure that children are cared for by suitable adults. However, I feel EYFS should be 'guidance' - as Birth to Three Matters was - not a statutory requirement for cms.
I went to a parent meeting at my child's new school today, before he goes to Reception in September. Not a policy, procedure, risk assessment in sight - yet I have to provide them and have them accessible to my parents. In the 18mths my son has been in a different nursery, I haven't had any obs or assessments shared with me, I don't know what they have in his personal file, but apparently it doesn't get passed on to the new school and they have to 'assess' him from scratch.
My recommendation would be to have EYFS as a guidance for cms, that we can refer to if we need to. Most of us have dcs of our own, know what the 'milestones' are and are perfectly capable of discussing concerns with parents - and vice versa - if we need to.
Please let us get back to what we do best - creating a fun, loving stimulating environment where children can thrive, learn and develop at their own pace. Without the paperwork, files, worry, stress etc that now comes with the role.......
I recommend you read the Guardian piece and the comments that follow, in the link Arfa gave in his earlier post. Sums up what most of us feel - with the odd 'exceptional' comment from those that haven't got a bloody clue what we actually do
[takes deep breath x 10 and goes to get a sugar lump from kitchen for high horse ]