Genuinely seeking views here about what's reasonable and necessary. DD2 (18 months old) has a mild chest infection, for which she has been prescribed antibiotics. She's had several days of feeling unwell, but seems much better today - no temperature, coughing much less, generally perkier. She hasn't been at her CM while she's been unwell - I kept her at home today just to be sure she was really fine, but was thinking I'd plan for her to go to CM as usual tomorrow.
I just had a call from CM telling me that I couldn't bring DD back without a letter from a doctor confirming she was fine 'to participate in normal acivities'. I wouldn't send her back to the CM unless she was better, and I can't see me getting a GP's letter by tomorrow, or even the day after. (When I've sought similar things before, it's taken a day or two for the letter to be available, once an appointment has been made for her to be seen etc.) I wouldn't be expecting the CM to give antibiotics.
Is it really necessary and reasonable for CM to insist on this? It seems like unnecessary bureaucracy to me - why is a doctor's word more valid than mine as DD's main carer?
Interested in your views. Am panicking about how to manage this week's work commitments...