Our nanny (with whom we usually get on really well, and who is generally absolutely fantastic with DD, 16 months) believes very strongly that DD needs to learn to go to sleep on her own. She is pushing very hard for us to leave DD in her room on her own at bedtime, popping in and out every few minutes, rather then sitting with her. I am very unhappy about this - I had always said that we would never be happy to do controlled crying and I feel that there's no need - DD already sleeps through the night.
For the last couple of weeks, we've tried it for short periods primarily because DD really loves her, she is generally really excellent, and I feel that I need to compromise in order not to lose her - I feel that I'm weighing this up against DD's overall unhappiness if our nanny were to leave.
However, last night was so awful that I'm still upset about it. I popped in and out a couple of times and after ten minutes of unsuccessful "popping", went back in and sat down with her. She was already so upset that she carried on screaming and screaming and then vomited her whole dinner up. I feel like the worst parent in the world. The first thing I said was that we couldn't do this again and we would need to go back to sitting with her. Our nanny just kept saying that we would talk about it today.
I guess my question is: is it unreasonable to ask our nanny to settle DD in the way we ask her to do it, and the way we are comfortable with? Am I being unreasonable in making this decision unilaterally? Could I ask the nannies out there whether they would expect the parents or the nanny to be making this decision?