I'm torn between 2 childminders. I have a 14 month old. There is a significant price difference between them. We are saving for a deposit on a house, so extra money in our pockets is a definite consideration. Both childminders are less than a 5 minute walk from our home and both collect and drop off at the same school which again is very close by to us all. So there are no advantages to either location wise.
Childminder A is older with young adult children. She has an assistant. She is very experienced. Our child would be one of 3 or 4 children on any given day, plus there are older children she picks up/drops off. The school is close by and reached on foot in less than 5 mins. Food is provided and she has a great food/meal time approach which echoes our own.
Childminder B. Newer to this career. Has young school age children of her own. She only looks after 1 other child close in age to our child, but she would only be there two days a week. It would mean our child would be the only charge for two days a week (aside from when the childminders children return from school). The childminder does activities outside the home, such as children's centres, library, toddler playgroups etc and meets with other childminders, so our child would meet other kids on the 'alone days'. Food is also provided here but I don't think she is as passionate about food as childminder A is (I probably need to ask her more about this).
So if you were me, what would you do? I know you can't really tell me, but I honestly can't decide what is better for our child. I love the food philosophy of childminder A, but B is significantly cheaper and has less charges, but I just can't work out whether more or less children is better or worse! If I could combine them both I would. This is really tough! Appreciate any advice.