I have one DD, who will be 1 next month. Currently she goes to a childminder's for part of the week, but for various logistical reasons I need to find an alternative from September. My preferred option is a nanny, but I can't afford to have someone full time, and so far I've not been able to find a family nearby who'd want to share.
My work is relatively flexible, and it suddenly struck me that I might be able to offer hours that are the inverse of someone with school-age children: so 9.30 to 3 each day (27.5 hrs/week), and I'd look after DD myself in the school holidays.
I'd envisage paying a gross salary of around £300 a week for 43 weeks a year - i.e. 39 weeks working for me plus 4 weeks paid holiday, with the other 9 weeks covered by the other family. This is c. £11 an hour gross; evened up over the year, £250 a week. (I know NI etc. is extra.)
My questions are: would this sound like an attractive option for a good nanny? Is there any obvious pitfall I haven't thought of? Would I be offering too little money (I'm in Cambridge)? I certainly don't want to be mean or pay under the going rate, but this is pretty much my limit - it may be of course that I just can't afford it, and it has to be nursery. This is DH's view!
Hope this makes sense, and thanks for reading. I'd be so grateful for advice.