I have a 2.5 yr old attending a cm twice a week. My CM said he had been kicking at tea time and that she was planning to sit him on his own from now on. I am unsure of whether she meant that she was going to give him warnings if he was misbehaving and then sit him alone or whether she was just going to sit him on his own regardless of his behaviour. I have contacted her to get confirmation but am yet to hear back from her.
I guess my concerns are that how is he going to learn table manners if he is not given the opportunity to sit with others? I totally understand that she also has to ensure the other child is not being hurt or meal times are not being disrupted but I also feel like there is more to this issue.
For example, she said that my son sits really well and behaves nicely at lunchtime when the other 2 older boys arent there. I am not saying I think that my son is not at fault but I feel like maybe the three of them are winding each other up and she appears to struggle managing with the children when she has more than 2 iyswim (based on what she says).
My child is a "normal" 2.5 year old and at mealtimes in our house poor behaviour is challenged appropriately and on the whole he sits down nicely and does not kick or hurt his siblings.
I just feel concerned because I could understand if she had given him warnings (not sure what happened as she did not explain the incident fully) and then put him on his own as no other child should be kicked etc but surely if you just isolate the child regardless of there behaviour then it is not really addressing the issue? What if my son at next meal time is sat alone yet would have been well behaved? is is acceptable to exclude him for something he may do?
Im a bit torn really