Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Paid childcare

Discuss everything related to paid childcare here, including childminders, nannies, nurseries and au pairs.

rates for central London nanny working with own baby

24 replies

Mummyinthedark · 24/07/2012 22:14

We need to agree an hourly rate for our nanny returning from mat leave, working with her baby in our house.
Will be updating the contract to reflect various changes we've agreed between us. We need to adjust the nett hourly rate and want to come up with something fair but reflective of the difference between full attention to our family versus a division of attention between our family and her own baby's needs.
We would really appreciate any examples of rates others are paying/getting in this circumstance.

thanks

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Mintyy · 24/07/2012 22:16

I would offer her 70% of what you were paying before. Seems fair to me.

YoulllaughAboutItOneDay · 24/07/2012 22:18

We are zone 2/3, but we paid 80% if that helps. I don't do net agreements though - do think about whether you mean x% of previous net, or previous gross.

Mummyinthedark · 25/07/2012 06:40

Thanks, very helpful. I feel awful negotiating somone i like and trust to a lower pay rate but the rational part of me tells me it's fair ( and I suppose I would get resentful about paying a full rate and getting a different kind of interaction with my DC if I didn't reflect this in terms of the salary).

I'll try and find a minute to give the agency we used a call to ask them if they have come across similar circumstances and what salaries were offered or agreed on.

I'll report back in case anyone else is interested.

OP posts:
Mummyinthedark · 25/07/2012 15:42

About to call agency.

Any more views/experiences?

Thanks

OP posts:
Mummyinthedark · 26/07/2012 14:35

Agency says normal practice is, as others have suggested, reduce salary by about 20 per cent, adjusting to reflect how highly valued the individual nanny is.

OP posts:
forevergreek · 27/07/2012 11:33

Some people take off a %, but tbh everyone I know of has paid the same if it's someone who is returning as opposed to someone new.

It can be very easy to loose nanny as they can't afford to take less do just be prepared that that could happen.

Blondeshavemorefun · 27/07/2012 18:18

did you not discuss this when she said she wanted to return to work with her baby?

Redglow · 27/07/2012 21:01

When I returned when I had my children I stayed on the same money.

Mummyinthedark · 27/07/2012 23:31

Blondes. I said we would set out proposed new hours Anne duties and then discuss, I want to be able to include proposed salary in that discussion.
Until we had that initial conversation I wasn't sure she would be coming back at all.

OP posts:
Mummyinthedark · 27/07/2012 23:31

Sorry, iPad typos - not Anne, and!

OP posts:
forevergreek · 28/07/2012 07:35

As a nanny if I were to go on maternity leave I would want to have organised coming back and salary/ hours before I left as would need to look elsewhere otherwise

Seems a tad strange

Mummyinthedark · 28/07/2012 08:11

Why strange? Quite a few women I know thought they'd want to go back to work before they had a baby, then, once it was born couldn't bear to leave it.

Before ML started our nanny had planned to come back, but leave her baby with someone else. However, I was not very surprised when we talked recently, that she now feels she doesn't want to do this, and wants to try to reach an accommodation about having the baby with her.

OP posts:
Karoleann · 28/07/2012 08:38

Two friends one didn't cut salary but nanny became just after school nanny, so 3-6 5 days a week. Second cut rate from £10/ hour to £8/ hour.
It's okay fair that you should be paying less as they're looking after another child as well as your own. You wouldn't expect to pay the same if a nanny took another unrelated child into a nanny share, so why should it be any different if it's her own?

eastmidlandsnightnanny · 28/07/2012 13:54

I think a 20-30% reduction is fair when I do ad-hoc work and would need to take my little one with me I offer a 1/3 off my normal rates although have only ever taken him on one occasion.

Its a luxury to be able to take your child to work with you and she will have no childcare costs to consider, whereas for many of us (inc me I work 4 days in my NHS job) a good 40-75% of our salary goes on childcare.

Remember to write into contract what happens when her child is ill - ie if she doesnt come in what happens with pay. Is she happy to bring her child to work if your child/ren are unwell inc contagious illness' as for you the advantage of a nanny is they care for your unwell children which obv a nursery or cm wouldnt.

Good luck and hope all works out for you.

YoulllWinGoldOneDay · 28/07/2012 14:48

I agree nightnanny - it is a massive luxury to be able to bring your child with you to work, both at a personal level and a financial one.

I can understand people saying that the nanny might not be able to 'afford' to take a pay cut, but if she goes to another job surely the new employer is likely to expect to discount too? And it's not like the situation where an employee is paying for childcare and it cancels out her earnings, so it might not be worth returning. I know it is in no way the same as she is still caring for her own child, but at a purely financial level I know many women who would give their eye teeth for having children to have only dented their earnings by 20%.

Mummyinthedark · 28/07/2012 16:12

Thanks. Really appreciate these comments, some good advice and some good insights into the emotional/maternal aspect.

I think I am going to offer a rate just a small cut below what we were paying - I do want my nanny to still feel very highly valued. I do agree, being able to bring your child to work is a great option that is not available to many of us.

OP posts:
bbcessex · 28/07/2012 16:31

Hi there, we've had two 'nannies with own child'.. both had their babies at the start though, and both went on mat leave and did not return.

I didn't pay less for Nanny with own child, but with hindsight, (and were I to have a nanny with own child again), I would.

I now have a nanny without a child, and the difference in what my children are able to do / plans for trips / order the house is in etc. is very noticeable in my case. Having said that, both my NWOC were lovely, totally reliable and very high standard, and there were definitely plus points, but my current nanny and her child-free status would be my future preference.

I think it's right to renegotiate, especially as your nanny said she wasn't planning on bringing her baby in the first instance (although you were obv right to second guess that!).

The 20% reduction sounds very fair to me. Tough as it seems, if your nanny isn't happy with that (which she may not be, and I can see both sides as she may initially think she can carry on as exactly as before) I would consider if you are better off with a new nanny.. Very much depends on how you value your nanny and what her bond with your children is I guess.

bbcessex · 28/07/2012 16:32

Meant to say good luck!

Mummyinthedark · 28/07/2012 21:54

Thanks BBCessex - and others. This has been a useful thread, hope it benefits anyone else in similar circumstances.

OP posts:
OlymPicture · 29/07/2012 13:07

I think a 20% reduction is very generous, childcare used to eat up 80% of my salary.

Blondeshavemorefun · 30/07/2012 13:34

have always said a nwoc should earn less as they are not giving 100% attention to your children and is a HUGE perk to be able to take your baby to work and not pay any childcare fees

20% seems about the average drop -

Earlsfield2 · 24/08/2012 15:07

I am a Nanny who returned to work after having my little boy and i took him with me. I agreed a drop from £10 and hour to £8 an hour.

NiamhThomas30 · 24/08/2012 18:28

I think you are right to offer a reduced payment. As a childminder, I have the advantage of looking after my own children too, but it does take a dent in my pay packet. They take up a proportion of the quota I'm registered for, meaning until they are older, I do not earn my potential.

Niamh

NiamhThomas30 · 24/08/2012 18:30

I think you are right to offer a reduced payment. As a childminder, I have the advantage of looking after my own children too, but it does take a dent in my pay packet. They take up a proportion of the quota I'm registered for, meaning until they are older, I do not earn my potential.

Niamh

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread