DH is a teacher and I am currently on maternity leave from my job in the City. We will need a full-time nanny starting in September when the school term starts, at which point DS will be 9 months old.
We counted up the number of weeks DH actually works and it's only 35 weeks a year. He would probably need the nanny to work some of the time on the first and last week of each holiday and half terms (but possibly she wouldn't need to work at all if we decide to go away those weeks ourselves) and he would look after DS the rest of the time.
This means we'd be looking for a nanny to work:
full time (50h/week on average) - 35 weeks p.a. during school terms
"flexi" time (anywhere from 0 to 25h/week) - 6 weeks p.a. half terms/school hols
and then 11 weeks p.a. (!!) of holiday during the rest of the school holidays.
Working out hourly rates in this situation is doing our collective heads in as we both just get salaries and are expected to work whatever hours we need to get the job done.
We looked up the starting salary for a primary school teacher and it's around £20,000 p.a. gross.
Given our circumstances, would it be unacceptable and totally out of step with the market to offer a nanny an annual salary of, say, £20k gross paid monthly (works out about £1,345 take home pay on the default tax code) and then just be really clear and set out in her contract which weeks of the year she'd be full time, which are "flexi" time and which are holiday? Can anyone see any problems with this approach? Any and all comments and wise words welcomed!!
Extra info in case it's relevant: we're outside the M25 and not looking for someone with loads of experience and qualifications.