I am just wondering if you this is something that would be of interest to a childminder, or if you would laugh at me.
I am trying to reduce my commitment to the greedy taxman; and am therefore pondering the idea of an au pair / childminder combination rather than a full time nanny.
I have:
DD aged 8 (or will be when I go back to work in March), full time school
DS1 aged (almost) 6, full time school.
DS2 aged 3 months in March.
So, I have just dropped from full time live in nanny to au pair for this term. In a few weeks, I begin maternity leave, when I won't have any childcare. So, when I go back to work (full time) in March, I am thinking of the following arrangement:
Live in au pair to get all three kids ready in the morning and get them to the school gate for 8:45. Pass baby to childminder, who would work:
term time only
8:45 - 3:15
I will not pay for her hols or sick leave or any other time she is not available for work.
I will pay 100% for any time we are on hols, bbaby sick, or any other reason we don't don't show up. I would like to define term time by the school calendar.
I would obviously need to find a childminder who looks after school aged kids and drops them at the school gate. So, then (I'm hoping) she would have a vacancy for the duration of the school day and she could look after my baby and then pass him back to the au pair at the gate at the end of the school day.
So, is this too much faffing around? Do childminders prefer to have the school day free? Or might I find someone who would agree to term time only, school hours only?
Honest opinions please! If I am dreaming, please tell me so.
I thought I would advertise in the school newsletter/grapevine in about Feb. so as to target the childminders who already frequent the schoolgate.