Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Paid childcare

Discuss everything related to paid childcare here, including childminders, nannies, nurseries and au pairs.

is ofsted getting rid off the e.y.f.s. by 2011

10 replies

missymoo2411 · 18/07/2010 23:06

im a cm and was at our minders group last week and one off the nursery teachers from thelocal childrens centre/nursey came to visit and as we were talking sh said that the new govement along with ofsted comming in was thinking of getting rid of the eyfs but surley they would have to replace it .(god wouldnt it be bliss if it was just somthing more simpler)has anyone else heard anything .

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Avantia · 18/07/2010 23:12

there's going to be a review , here

zandy · 18/07/2010 23:18

Your link doesnt work.

nannynick · 18/07/2010 23:26

try this link

Hopandpop · 19/07/2010 00:10

really? part of my degree is the EYFS next year a whole year!!!! so if it changes my year f study will be wasted?

missymoo2411 · 19/07/2010 08:10

the link is still not working

OP posts:
Avantia · 19/07/2010 09:06

Funny thing links ..

It says this ..

Children?s Minister Sarah Teather today asked Dame Clare Tickell, Chief Executive of Action for Children, to carry out a review of the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) so that it is less bureaucratic and more focused on young children?s learning and development.

Ministers are concerned that the EYFS framework is currently too rigid and puts too many burdens on the Early Years workforce, which has led to some of the workforce saying they are spending less time with children, and more time ticking boxes.

The Government has asked Dame Clare, a children and families expert, to make sure the standards that support young children?s learning are based on the best and latest research on children?s development. They want to shift the focus to getting children ready for education and to increasing the attainment of children from deprived backgrounds.

The review will cover four main areas:

Scope of regulation ? whether there should be one single framework for all Early Years providers.
Learning and development ? looking at the latest evidence about children?s development and what is needed to give them the best start at school.
Assessment ? whether young children?s development should be formally assessed at a certain age, and what this should cover.
Welfare ? the minimum standards to keep children safe and support their healthy development.
Children?s Minister Sarah Teather said:

I am always impressed by the dedication of professionals who are working hard to give young children the best start in life. They play a vital role in helping children from all backgrounds to have a good start in school and reach their full potential. Professionals deserve to have the freedom to do their jobs and not have to deal with unnecessary bureaucracy.

It is not right or fair that children from deprived backgrounds that do really well in their early years are overtaken by lower achieving children from advantaged backgrounds by age five. We need good quality early learning for all children and a framework that raises standards, as well as keeping children safe.

Through this review we want to hear about what is and isn?t working well in the EYFS. We also need to create a fairer and more flexible childcare market that is responsive to parents and the rising numbers of children in childcare settings.

I am delighted that Clare has agreed to lead this important review. Her knowledge of the needs of children and families, especially those from more disadvantaged areas, as well as the importance of early intervention, means she is well placed to assess the best way to support young children, and free up the system so that it works for both childcare workers and parents.

Dame Clare Tickell, Chief executive of Action for Children, said:

There has been a lot of debate in recent years about what young children should be learning before they reach school, and the pressure and burdens this puts on the early years sector.

It is important that professionals in the early years sector have the time to tackle the important issues ? helping children from poorer backgrounds, and those with special needs, as well as giving all children a fun and stimulating learning experience.

I look forward to conducting this review and to listening to professionals, parents, carers and early years experts. I hope to find a way forward that supports the different approaches to learning and development, so that we have some of the best early years standards in the world.

The coalition Government is committed to investing in the Early Years, and recently announced the extension of free childcare for all three and four year olds to 15 hours a week. The review of the EYFS will ensure that good quality early learning benefits all children, as the Government believes this can make a real difference to success in later life. It also has a more significant impact for children from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Dame Clare will provide a final report in spring 2011. The Government will then consult on any proposed changes before they take effect from September 2012.

Notes to editors:
Watch the video concerning the announcement from this page.
Watch the video of Children's Minister Sarah Teather visiting a school in Newham as part of the launch of the EYFS review.
The EYFS has been statutory since 2008 and sets standards in learning and welfare for any provider caring for children aged 0 to 5.
The framework was introduced in response to research that highlighted how good quality childcare can support children?s learning and development.
The current Early Years framework is split into two parts. The first part sets out learning and development requirements. The second part is the welfare requirements, which set out what Early Years providers must do to keep children safe, promote their welfare, and ensure the suitability of adults, premises, the environment and equipment.
Early Years providers may apply for exemptions or modifications from the learning and development requirements where: they are temporarily unable to deliver the full learning and development requirements; or a majority of parents agree with the provider?s assessment that an exemption is required because the established principle which governs their practice conflicts with elements of the EYFS learning and development requirements.

pippin26 · 19/07/2010 16:20

I cannot see them getting rid of the whole kit and kaboodle, what I can see them doing is removing some of the statutory parts to appease certain sectors.
Its cost too much money and too much time and effort on a lot of people for it to be shoved aside.
This government will make all the right noises in trying to appease people.
What I DO think they will do is get rid of of EYPs.

I think it will make us childminders go backwards in terms of professionalism if they say that we don't have to use it.

What I DO think they have to do, is qualify for OFSTED, exactly what is expected of us so this hit and miss system of inspection is smoothed out

leeloo1 · 19/07/2010 17:15

'I think it will make us childminders go backwards in terms of professionalism if they say that we don't have to use it.'

I completely agree with Pippin on this. Sadly though they've got rid of sooo many strategies etc that have had equally huge amounts of money spent on them, so I think if they want it to go (or if it suits their agenda for it to go) then it'll go.

Avantia · 19/07/2010 18:12

It's been in two years now ad we are just getting to grips with it and I will say that in our setting we are fairly happy with it and have some of the paper work to suit our needs .

When we had the training on it the attitude of the Early years trainers from the council 'was one hat fits all' which it claerly doesn't. To be honest they really didn't have much of a clue about how each type of setting wold implement it all.

Now we feel a bit more secure and happy with it they are going to review it and god knows what will happen - bets on back to Foundation Stage and Birth to three ?

Annner · 19/07/2010 18:14

I agree. My daughter has just finished Year R as a first product of EYFS from preschool through to Year R - and I have to admit that my initial reservations about it were not borne out. She loves school - as do the other children in the class, and found the transition to be seamless. It was always clear what she was doing, and communications have always focused on observations of her own discoveries rather than the teacher-talk stuff of my Year R or the nasty formal flashcards of forced learning in 70s nursery schools. It has helped our little preschool serving a deprived area to meet the needs of children from a diverse range of backgrounds because of its structure.

I have seen some lovely write-ups by CMs of their mindees, and it seems that they would never have been doing as much were they not required to.

I agree that it has helped to professionalise Childminding, and has contributed to driving out for good the "sit them in front of a DVD while I get on with my own stuff" brigade.

This said, parts do need ironing out, though.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page