My son was born last January - away from home and early so I was completely unprepared. I had no hospital bag or notes with me and didn't expect things to move so quickly.
Anyway - he came along happy and healthy, but wouldn't feed in the hospital. Normal procedure is to let Mum and baby go home after seeing the baby feed well so I had to really work hard to let us go home - as he wasn't feeding but I was desperate to get nearer home.
I knew breast feeding was hard work and was sure it would happen in the next few )more relaxed hours) at home). Anyway - he lost a lot of weight and it wasn't until about day 3 when a new (and wonderful!) midwife came out and immediately realised he was severely tongue tied. Which explained why he couldn't feed at all and why I was getting such bad blood blisters.
Anyway - we had to wait 15 days to get a referral to Southampton hospital who performed what is a relatively minor procedure and did allow him to breastfeed finally. But not after a lot more heartache teaching him how to do it at 2 weeks old.
Still, I don't regret having it done - he happily breastfed until 9 months old and can now poke his tongue out at Mummy.
The procedure itself is relatively minor - a very quick snip with some scissors - I think DS1 was away from me for a total of about 90 seconds. Its also still quite upsetting for all concerned - such a tiny baby, there was blood in our case, and a lot of crying and at least 48 hours of a very sad baby afterwards. Which they don't tell you about at the hospital - only the 'positives'. Its also not something they would correct at birth - most midwives aren't legally allowed to perform the procedure (even if they're qualified to do it) and so you would have to get the hospital referral. My doctor was sceptical as to whether or not it was something that would correct itself or not, but she was wrong - he lost 12% of his body weight and we were desperate. It sorted things for us.
We were also told that its not necessarily something they grow out of. And it could affect speech in later life but they couldn't confirm this so it became a gamble.
I guess what I am saying is that I saw 4 BF specialists in the hospital before they let me go home - none of whom picked up on his very severe tongue tie. Neither did the doctor who did our day home visit or the next 2 midwifes.
It is something I would recognise again immediately - a very white scar like tissue under the tongue. Its actually quite easy to tell because a small baby when they cry (loudly) would usually life their tongue up - and he didn't. It stayed stuck flat to the base of his mouth. He also couldn't breastfeed at all, had a VERY stiff jaw, and you could feel it if you massaged under his tongue.
I don't think its something people routinely check for, in fact it is something that some professionals didn't recognise. So - I would check yourself. If you have no problems breastfeeding them chances are its not an issue, but it would be something to raise at day 3/4 if things aren't getting any better.
Oh, and he wouldn't take a bottle or a dummy either - his tongue was so rigid it just pushed them out - so they're more signs to check for.
Hope this helps?
Have you had experience of tongue-ties before or are you just being extra-cautious?
P.S. I'm due no2 in May and won't be relying on any 'specialists' to help me diagnose if this one has a tongue tie - I'll check myself and then arranged the referral to Southampton.