I know, I know, nobody in their right mind would chose to go to the North Middlesex Hosp because it is so run-down?.. but I gave birth to my first-one at the Whittington and I had a dreadful experience.
Looking at stats on instrumental deliveries etc I have to note that north middlesex does fare better than the Whittington?
- birth per year: W: 3700 Nth M: 3500
- induction rate: W: 19.5% Nth M: 14.1%
- cesarian rate: W: 27.2% Nth M: 24.1%
- instrumental rate: W:15.9% Nth M: 6.2%
www.birthchoiceuk.com/BirthChoiceUKFrame.htm?
www.birthchoiceuk.com/StatsExplain.htm
Now you have to wonder why does the NthM has better stats? Especially after this: A newborn baby died of a fractured skull (because of forceps) after doctors failed to follow clinical guidelines and wrongly delayed delivering him by an emergency Caesarean section Link: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/6606245/Baby-died-of-fractured-skull-after-Caesarean-section-delayed .html
Would it be still wrong to go for the North Middlesex? This accident happened not long ago and they still may have staff problem?
Or was it a one-off that could have happened at the whittington?
Anybody had experience of the North middlesex? I am scared shitless of instrumental delivery - and I will be attempting a VBAC - In roughly 8 weeks.
thanks