Hmm, tricky one OP. I was definitely scared of VB in first pregnancy because of all the horror stories I'd heard but I did a lot of research on natural birth, had a detailed birth plan, and just decided to see it as a challenge and try as far as possible for a straightforward, natural birth without interventions.
Then I went 10 days overdue, ended up having a long, failed, induction and finally, 2 days later, an EMCS. I'm now 31 weeks pregnant and have booked ELCS for this baby.
Having said all that, I'm still a bit doubtful about my decision because even though, for various reasons, my chances of a VBAC aren't that good (I barely dilated at all last time despite everything they threw at it).
Yes, there are difficult natural births but I now know a lot of people who've had great, straightforward VBs with no lasting damage and no trauma. That includes home births, managed births with epidurals, even induced births. And I know people who've had serious problems with C-Sections - one had an accidental 'nick' to her bladder during surgery and therefore had to have a further operation.
Also my recovery from EMCS wasn't great. My stitches came open, were patched up again but ultimately took a long time to heal. I also had real problems with BF and DD ended up being mix-fed. And whilst I've more or less avoided the 'overhang' so far, I'm sure I'll get one next time and it definitely messes with your stomach muscles long-term in a way that VB doesn't seem to. So another CS is not a decision I've taken at all lightly.
I think the fact that this is likely to be your only DC makes a real difference actually and would imagine your other reasons for favouring a CS would be taken seriously and wish you the very best with your decision/birth. I've really just put all that down to try and explain why some people see it as an odd decision.