I have looked through some threads about 3rd degree tears, episiotomies etc, but they haven't completely addressed my situation, so I'm posting here for any help or advice.
I had a 3rd degree tear with my first child, two and a half years ago. I had a good repair and healed fairly well, though my pelvic floor is pretty rubbish; though I feel to some extent I was lucky and don't want to push that luck. I was never offered any follow-up or debrief for this, and never thought to ask for one. But as this pregnancy has progressed, this issue has been dwelling more and more on my mind, so that now it is pretty much my main concern. It doesn't help that I have had a lot of contradictory advice from various different midwives, registrars and consultants (and indeed from my own internet researches), everything from elective c-section to just letting nature take its course. I understand that this is partly just because there is no one 'right' course, but sometimes I really yearn for the old-fashioned kind of consultant who would just tell you what to do!
Anyway, I do have a sort of a plan now, but I am still second-guessing myself all the time and don't feel entirely settled or happy. I should say that as far as it is possible to tell what went wrong last time, the main factors were probably largish size baby (9lb 5oz) plus rather quick labour (30 min 2nd stage) with fairly uncontrollable urge to push and not really feeling I knew what I was doing. I did end up delivering on my back, which may have been a factor (tried to do so in semi-kneeling/all-fours position, but wasn't getting anywhere.) (I say as far as possible to tell, as I am now at a different hospital, and though my notes were, I'm told, requested from there some two or three months ago, they never came through.)
So, I have felt all along that I wouldn't want a section, though I'm not quite sure why (mainly don't like the idea of long recovery, possible complications and/or infection.) In theory I like the idea of a natural birth without intervention, even a waterbirth or homebirth, but in practice I am too concerned about the possibility of another 3rd degree tear to want to risk it. This is especially the case as our local hospital is not great, is rather short-staffed, and I just don't feel confident that I would get the attention I'd need from an experienced midwife to manage my delivery well enough to avoid a tear. So I think I am opting for what feels like a 'least-bad' choice, which is to request an elective medio-lateral episiotomy, in the hopes that even if this does extend it will not be into the previously damaged area. I am told this means I shouldn't use the pool for pain relief earlier in labour, since then I would have to wait for 'waterlogged' tissue to dry out before I could be stitched up, which wouldn't be ideal. (My consultant has at least recommended I be stitched up by the registrar, which I'd hope would give better chance for good recovery.) The other thing I think I want to go for is an epidural, since in my case slowing down labour a bit might be a good thing, and especially it might take away some of the uncontrollable urge to push, so that I can more calmly do as the midwives direct. Ideally it seems I'd like to 'breathe' baby out rather than push him out, but I have no idea how to do this, the 'parentcraft' course I was on said there wasn't any point in covering breathing techniques for labour at all.
There are two other (unrelated?) factors to be considered. I have bad SPD, and the positions that are good for SPD are obviously pretty much out when looking at an epidural and episiotomy, but I think I am resigned to just having to lump that since the tearing issue is a greater concern to me. The other thing is that I have ME, which means that very active birthing is something I would be unable to do anyway. Possibly my lack of fitness going into labour is something that predisposes me to tearing, but there's not really anything I can do about that. (I have been going to an antenatal pilates class, also I've been doing perineal massage, as whether or not it will help I don't see it can do any harm.)
One concern is that my first labour was fairly quick, and I seem to take strongly after my mother and her mother, where second labour was even quicker. I have been advised to go into hospital as early as possible, but I do worry that I won't get there in time to have an epidural (I didn't last time, though in retrospect I could have gone in sooner) or that things will be really rushed when it comes to the episiotomy.
As I say, I am not entirely happy with any of this; it feels like less of a positive birth-plan, and more like attempting to make the best of a bad job. I would be grateful for any advice. As well as just trying to sort out the practical issues of what is the best approach to take, I just find the whole thing incredibly upsetting, and am really very frightened of giving birth at all. It's also obviously really late in the game to still be undecided and chopping and changing my mind; I did bring the issue up at my booking-in appointment and subsequent antenatal appts, when the conflicting advice started, but nothing has really been resolved and the closer to delivery I've come, the worse I have been feeling about it.
Sorry for epic length of post; I have lost all ability to be concise.