Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Childbirth

Share experiences and get support around labour, birth and recovery.

Elective C-Section or Natural Delivery?

2 replies

Bird4462 · 04/11/2025 16:24

Hi there,

looking for some advice - I’m currently pregnant and due in the next few weeks. At our 36 week growth scan we were told baby was head down - which was great and they shouldn’t move from here. At 36w + 6 our midwife felt them and believed they’d shifted to an oblique lie so we were referred to a scan the next day. At the scan (37w) we were told baby was fully transverse and so not compatible with a natural delivery due to the risk of cord prolapse. We decided not to attempt an ECV and booked in for an elective section at 39w +2. We were rescanned today (37w +6) and somehow the baby has again moved back to head down - I think I felt them do this yesterday. Whilst this is great news with the risk of cord prolapse being much lower we now have to decide whether to cancel the elective c section or go ahead. A part of me is nervous that if the baby has managed to move so many times this close to the end are they likely to keep moving? I don’t want to cancel the section as it was really tough to get a date scheduled at all. Does anyone have any experience of babies turning so close to the end? Thanks!

OP posts:
Weetwood · 04/11/2025 17:29

I had similar experience, was transverse before about 36 weeks, then head down, then on due date I felt DC move back sideways, I knew because when they were transverse it felt like they were tickling the inside of the top of my legs. A feeling I never had with previous pregnancy or since. But I hadn’t been told this was high risk at this stage although luckily I was booked in a few days later to discuss induction and it was picked up, transverse oblique lie. I was immediately admitted, told to stay by my bed, push the call button if I felt any movement and get on hands and knees on the bed. They got me a c section later that day. Basically it was taken very seriously. Dc now at uni so I don’t know what is current practice.

I’d hoped to avoid a c section but didn’t really mind having one as I was happy to have a baby who was ok, although even with a c section it took ages to get the baby out as cord was round a shoulder. I don’t know if this is any help to you. I think you need to discuss with midwife and obstetrician.

ZingDramaQueenOfSheeba · 04/11/2025 17:39

Babies can position themselves back & forth even at this stage: unless the head is actually engaged all bets are off!

If it's your first baby and you were not expressly advised to have an ELSC then go for a natural birth.

My 4th was a footling breech, one foot firmly planted on top my cervix (yikes) and wouldn't budge even with an ECV (which was horrendous and I regretted).
So there was no choice but to have an ELSC.

If you are planning more kids avoiding a C-section might be a better choice as there's an increased risk with every VBAC (they treat you like a ticking timebomb) so that's something to consider.

But you can only decide what feels safest & best for you. Best of luck

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread