Sorry if these questions have been asked before, but I'm trying to get my pg brain round my options and arguments before my next round of ante-natal appointments...
Dd was delivered by emergency caesarean in Aug 06. My labour was induced at 38+4 because the consultant thought dd had stopped growing. I was given prostglandins to induce labour. Labour progressed normally, except I couldn't keep any food or water down, I got to fully dilated, but then my contractions slowed down. I was given oxytocin, but several hours later dd was still no closer to being born, so the obstetricians took over from the
MWs and I had an emergency section after one failed attempt with forceps.
Although externally my scar is low and horizontal, I'm fairly sure that internally I was cut vertically (I had some sensation of pressure during the section and I'm fairly sure they sewed my back up to my diaphragm, but I wasn't going to say anything because I didn't want a general anaesthetic).
I would prefer not to have a section this time (no 2 due in Oct). Some of the information I've been reading suggest that if there was a vertical incision, or the labour was induced with prostglandins, or oxytocin was given, then these are factors that increase the risk of the scar rupturing. The consultant I'm seeing is the same one who decided dd should be induced, and I have the feeling he is very interventionist, but my MW is supportive of my preference for VBAC. Does anyone have any advice, or can point me in the direction of good advice?