Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Childbirth

Share experiences and get support around labour, birth and recovery.

Has anyone else been thrown this line as a reason for induction?

51 replies

OldieButGoldie · 06/03/2008 20:19

Was at hospital today for monitoring, currently 40+10, and myself and baby are both absolutely fine. When cervix was checked it had softened a little from last check 6 days ago but was still unfavourable for a sweep.

I asked to wait to 42 weeks (Monday) and see how things were. However I was told that it could take several days of prostin gel to kick start my labour (as I am in my 40s, first child and unfavourable cervix) and by that stage I would be well past my dates and.....the "baby's reserves would be depleted" by this stage making him less able to cope with labour and likely to become distressed, resulting in a CS. She advised me the best way for me to avoid a section was to be admitted for induction tonight. I refused, it sounded like gobble-di-gook to me, and I needed time to think (and ask mnet ),

Any opinions on this one?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
JayneF · 08/03/2008 19:38

Hi Oldie But Goldie,

This has been a great thread for me to follow (40yrs, 40 +4 weeks). I really hope that whether natural or induced you have a good experience and a joyous outcome.

keep bouncing on that ball gal!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page