Absolutely, Aloha - for the few months prior to and after the birth the way it happens can feel like the most important thing in the world, but honestly, a year down the line all the other memories of the real, living baby become so much more important than how they arrived.
For both of you to be happy and healthy, that's the important thing.
Now I'm going to get a bit more controversial: I'm sure that there are stats out there about post birth damage - both for caesarian and vaginal birth. My best guess is that they probably show similar levels of benefit/damage, otherwise people would be voting with their feet based on anecdotal experience. Let's face it, both ways can inflict damage - some of it temporary and some of it more permanent (both physical and pyschological). How you come out of it depends on your physiology, state of mind and luck.
Since both ways have inherent risks (and benefits) I tend to be of the 'its the woman's choice and nobody else's business' school of thought. With one exception. I find it hard to accept that a scheduled elective caesarian, for reasons of social convenience or appearance, is a good use of tax resources.
I'm sure that this is a very rare thing anyway (probably the press makes any examples up) but if people are encouraged to believe it is a good use of NHS resources then we run a long term risk of those resources being diverted from, for example, necessary emergency caesarians.
If people want to pay for elective c-sections privately, fine. If there are sound medical or pyschological reasons (including a morbid fear of childbirth), fine.
FWIW I used to be much more hardline anti caesarian but reading this thread has given me a little taste of what it must be like to want an elective caesarian - I think Claire has not been very well supported here and I'm not surprised she didn't post again.
There, that's my dose of plain speaking for the day. Anyone want to join in?