there is a risk of what they call "wet lung" for babies delivered by CS before 39weeks - it's not "new" news, but it has been in the news again lately. Presumably there was a reason why they did your c/s early? I'm suprised they didn't warn you about the risk.
I'm glad to hear your DD is now doing well
FWIW my hospital have a policy of no CS before 39wks unless mum or baby are in imminent danger.
this is an extract from the BMJ which explains it
-----
British Medical Journal : Elective caesarean can increase the risk to the fetus
In cases where normal vaginal delivery incurs considerable risk to the mother and fetus, elective caesarean section may be justified, but decisions must take into account the risk to the infant associated with delivery before 39 weeks' gestation.
It is now clear that respiratory distress syndrome is indeed seen in "term" infants and is a considerable source of morbidity and mortality in this group. A recent article by Madar et al shows that mechanical ventilation to treat presumed surfactant deficiency is 120 times more likely to be needed after elective delivery at 37-38 weeks than after delivery at 39-41 weeks.
We recently revisited this issue as part of a departmental audit...These findings are consistent with the findings of previous studies and confirm that babies delivered before 39 weeks' gestation are at increased risk of respiratory distress and that for term infants caesarean section before the onset of labour results in a considerably greater risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity than delivery by any other means. Moreover, the risk of respiratory morbidity is halved with each completed week of gestation between 37 and 41 weeks.
Evidence based guidelines should be established so that when there is no clear benefit to mother or fetus elective caesarean section before 39 weeks' gestation is avoided.