Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Childbirth

Share experiences and get support around labour, birth and recovery.

How bad was birthing a large baby?

47 replies

Zest11 · 09/06/2020 19:37

Hi all,

I'm pregnant with our first baby, a boy after IVF. So happy this is happening for us. At our scans he has been measuring big (but not big enough to do anything about). He was over 7lb at 36w so I am expecting a good 9lb-er and I am worried about the birth. Could any of you share your experiences (good or bad) of birthing a large baby. I am desperate for him to arrive safely and also scared of the damage he may cause coming out!

Thank you!

OP posts:
Goodebe · 09/06/2020 19:40

IME the labour was easier with my big baby than my smaller babies (3rd one almost 9lb) I stayed upright as much as possible and the weight of her combined with gravity made for a swift and easy labour - but I am not going to lie, the crowning stung...

NutterPotter · 09/06/2020 19:42

9lb 1 back to back water injections gaa and air, honestly the midwives had to tell me when to push as I could not feel anything due to the adrenaline

Wolfiefan · 09/06/2020 19:45

My first was 8lb 14 (weighed after he had a decent poo and wee all over the midwife. So I’m maintaining he was 9lb!)
I figured gravity made a heavier baby easier!
He was born two and a half hours after getting to hospital. Water birth. Also was back to back.
Crowning stung. But then he had his daddy’s huge head! 😆

IndecentFeminist · 09/06/2020 19:47

9lb11oz with #2, super speedy labour of about 1.5hrs. Only had gas and air, and while it was overwhelming, a bit scary and out of control it wasn't hugely painful. Those negatives are the result of the speed of labour more than the size however.

SacramentoQueen · 09/06/2020 19:49

I was really worried about birthing a big baby, my growth scans also showed an enormous head and I was convinced she would just get stuck but my midwife kept telling me that bigger babies are actually easier to push out. No idea if this is actually true, but I ended up with a 9lb 5 baby, with a head measurement on the 98th percentile and it was absolutely fine - i also have a fairly small frame. Also, most people that I know (including me) have ended up with quite different sized babies to what they were expecting as growth scans have huge error margins. Good luck and congratulations!

JoanieCash · 09/06/2020 19:50

Predicted weights can be really inaccurate so don’t get too stressed about final weight

Tropical2 · 09/06/2020 19:51

I was told that I was having a big baby at my 37w scan, around 9/10lb. He was 6lb 12oz when he was born. It's very common for the weight to be completely off so 🤞🏻 for you!

Samster45 · 09/06/2020 19:51

Mine wasn’t huge (8lbs5) but she was born at 37 weeks. She was back to back, contractions weren’t very efficient as they didn’t build, just a continuous pain. She was born in a water pool with just gas and air in 3 hours though. Small tear which was sutured. It wasn’t that bad to be honest. I remember it all, I remember the pain etc but it wasn’t horrendous.

mnahmnah · 09/06/2020 19:52

My second was 10lb 11oz and was easier than my first, who was 8lb 12oz. No issues with either of them. But I felt it went easier with the second.

However, it can depend on so many factors. General health, fitness etc of mum. Head size of baby. For what it’s worth, I’m 5’8 and a size 12, at the time a regular swimmer so pretty fit. Smooth pregnancy.

PrincessHoneysuckle · 09/06/2020 19:53

I had an epidural with ds who was 8lb 10.Thats all i'm saying Grin

mnahmnah · 09/06/2020 19:54

I should add that they didn’t leave any lasting damage either!

whycantIthinkofadecentusername · 09/06/2020 19:54

DS was predicted to be under 6lb. They told me he would potentially need to go to special care the lot. He was 10lb 7oz born. Someone got their figures drastically wrong Grin.

He was my first and only experience though so I can't give you any further advice or comparison, but will congratulations!

mnahmnah · 09/06/2020 19:55

Oh and I didn’t need an epidural no used diamorphine

mnahmnah · 09/06/2020 19:55

I used diamorphine! Typos

sarahc336 · 09/06/2020 20:03

My daughter wasn't big weight wise as was only7 pound 10 but her head was on the 95th percentile and I'm only 5 foot 1 and managed only with gas and air, it's amazing what our bodies are capable of Smile good luck xx

Mooserp · 09/06/2020 20:10

My firstborn wasn't excessively heavy, but had a large head.

Combined with a strong pelvic floor (not any more!) it made pushing very difficult and painful. I got quite a few internal cuts and tears which have left lumpy scars. I also have permanent changes to my labia.

However, I wasn't encouraged to be upright (this was in the 90s). I'm sure it would have been a lot easier if I was.

Susanna85 · 09/06/2020 20:11

Mine was 7lb at 35w and came out at 7. 4 when arrived at 38w. Sometimes they get it wrong / sometimes baby doesn't grow much the last couple of weeks.

I was worried about it so cut out all unnecessary sugar and limited white carbs at the end there

Weepingwillows12 · 09/06/2020 20:16

I dont think their size estimates are that accurate. My second was just shy of 10lb
and it was fine. My first was still big 8lb13 but was harder as he was back to back. Each labour is so unique, try not to worry.

winniesanderson · 09/06/2020 20:22

I was expecting my second to be huge going by the size of my bump and the tracking chart done by the midwife. Was expecting at least over 10lb. It really affected the birth as I was too afraid to push 😬 In the end she was just under 9lb. Had a quick birth in a midwife led unit. Just gas and air and no stitches or interventions needed. I was dreading it but I was wrong!

EmpressoftheMundane · 09/06/2020 20:22

First daughter was 8lbs second daughter was 9lbs. Both easy, vaginal births. The were long but not wide. They were also very developed and strong. (Second daughter pushed up on her hands and raised her chest off the floor in the first few hours of life!)

I have since been told that stronger babies help make their own way down the birth canal and of course, once the head and shoulders get through the rest just slips through. So, if the extra weight is in length it really doesn't matter.

A bigger baby isn't necessarily stronger, but a big baby can simply be a well developed baby.

allfalldown47 · 09/06/2020 20:24

Ds was 9Ib absolutely massive looking and I also had a whopper of a placenta (apparently!)
I had him in the water, with no other pain relief. It was bloody horrific, would definitely recommend accepting all offers of pain relief when birthing a large one!!

EyeDrops · 09/06/2020 20:25

Both mine got a bit stuck. 2nd degree tear with DD1 (9lb 2oz), managed with just gas & air, though her head was stuck halfway out for almost half an hour. Midwife was just preparing to do an episiotomy (according to DH) when I tore and it was fine after that. It felt unbearable at the time but I recovered very quickly, it was fine in the grand scheme of things!

DD2 was 10lb 7oz and just couldn't get round the u-bend in my pelvis. Eventual EMCS for failure to progress.

I've equally heard plenty of stories where large babies slip right out - every birth, woman and baby is different!

babyonetwothree · 09/06/2020 20:27

My first was 10 lbs 7oz and I didn't find it too hard - midwife said it looked big as his head crowned but didn't expect him to be that big . I was 2 weeks O/D though. Next two were nearly 9lbs and just under 10lbs but none of my labours were more than 8hrs and never had any epidurals, just pethidineSmile

BeeFarseer · 09/06/2020 20:28

Dreadful, I won't sugercoat it. So don't read past the gap I'll leave in my comment if you don't want to know, because it is graphic.

He was my first baby, and 10lb 14oz. I'll put some space here so you can whizz past if you don't want to read it.

...

...

...

...

...

...

I ended up with a 3rd degree tear, infected stitches afterwards which impeded healing, and overgrown scar tissue which was painful. I wore the thickest sanitary towels I could find, constantly, for a year, as I needed the cushioning. I couldn't have sex because it hurt too much.

The 3rd degree tear also caused toilet issues and while I wasn't fecally incontinent (thankfully!) the damage meant I got very little warning and had to get to a toilet immediately or risk an accident when I needed to poo. I couldn't fully empty my bladder properly for a while either.

I had amazing NHS physiotherapy for those issues and my bladder recovered on its own. I was taught to go to the toilet for a wee, wait ten minutes, then wee again so my bladder could empty properly. It took longer for the sphincter muscles/nerves to recover, but they did. This was years ago so I can't remember exactly what treatment I had, but I vaguely remember some sort of electrical stimulation (this may have been a diagnostic test rather than treatment) and a lot of exercises, including using dilators to stretch out scar tissue.

The overgrown scar tissue was burned away with silver nitrate (the same stuff they put up your nose to cauterise a bad nosebleed) which improved it, but I ended up having the whole scar refashioned under general anaesthetic and it's like the injury never ever happened. I can feel a thin scar but everything looks, feels, and works normally.

That all sounds horrendous written down all at once, and it was hard, but I knew I was getting the right help for it all. In the grand scheme of things, it was only a year, and I coped.

I had a very inactive birth (epidural, had to have forceps) but my DS was SO large and it was completely unexpected. I think I had undiagnosed gestational diabetes which contributed to his size. The labour itself was fine, honestly. I mostly laboured at home, and I had an epidural in hospital so I didn't feel any of the injury when it happened.

I've since had another DS, via elective c-section (such a lovely, calm experience) as I was told they didn't recommend a vaginal birth due to the issues I'd had. He was breech and had to be delivered two weeks early, so it would have been a c-section anyway.

DS2 was 8lb 10oz, so still a good size, but honestly, I reckon I could have sneezed him out. Grin I had gestational diabetes diagnosed fairly early into that pregnancy and kept excellent control of my blood sugar, so he was smaller than his brother.

I'm not having any more but if I was, I wouldn't be worried about a 9lb-er. I would also keep more active during labour and would probably forgo the epidural so I could labour in a position where gravity could help.

Habbyhadno · 09/06/2020 20:28

Fine, first was 10lb 1oz, second was 9lb, no stitches for either.

Swipe left for the next trending thread