Hi All! New to this thread, but couldn't help but throw my two cents in... this is, of course, my opinion:
Early cord clamping, i.e. clamping and cutting the cord before it has stopped pulsating, is something to be avoided if at all possible. You would be depriving your child of 20-40% of its blood volume.
"Early cord clamping may impede a successful transition and contribute to hypovolemic and hypoxic damage in vulnerable newborns" (Mercer, 2002).
Please see any of the following, or simply do a search:
www.bellybelly.com.au/articles/birth/cord-clamping-delaying-cord-clamping
http: //www.midwifeinfo.com/content/view/61/40/
www.naturaltransition.com/natural-childbirth-3rd stage.htm
cordclamp.com/
As for donating cord blood, from what I have researched it helps if you have an older child with a condition that could benefit. Genetic diseases are already present in umbilical cord blood, i.e. the cells cannot help the very child who may later develop that type of disease, although they could help other family members.
According to an article on WebMD.com (www.webmd.com/baby/guide/banking-your-babys-cord-blood) "There are very few documented cases of a child receiving his or her own banked cord blood as treatment. The Institute of Medicine says that there may only have been as few as 14 total of these procedures ever performed."
And, if it's for the sake of research, I ask any mother this: After reading up on delayed cord clamping, would you be willing to deprive your own child of those benefits for the sake of research?
Please do your own research and then decide what is best for your baby(ies).
Cheers to all!