Catching I'm afraid I did find your post patronising and rude. Having read it back, I still find it so. You came across as though your attitude was that I was a silly little girl, who had failed to appreciate the fact there were risks attached to all the options. I hope you don't speak to your patients like that, as to do so at a time they are vulnerable could be damaging. However, I guess from your latter post that you didn't mean to come across the way that you did.
Of course the choice is up to the OP. I never said differently. However, she has posted on MN to get views from other people, and that is what I, and you, have given. She is free to take on board the views that chime with her, and discard the rest.
With regard to strength of evidence, there is a lot more evidence to be had about induction, whereas the evidence on stillbirth is scant and we actually don't have much to go on. If we are to question the evidence, it would be truer to say we don't really know if going over 42 weeks is hugely riskier, though the studies we do have suggest it is slightly more risky, rather than imply that the studies are probably wrong and there is no extra risk. Lack of evidence because studies have not been done is not the same as there being no evidence in favour of an intervention, once having carried out RCTs. My view would be to go with the evidence, even though it's incomplete at present. I would personally rather induce or do ELCS than go over 42 weeks. Others must feel the same as me, otherwise it would not be NHS policy. However, you and OP might choose otherwise.
With regard to stillbirth in the U.K. generally, I think it is disgusting that we have such a high rate, and that we are not offering better care, and doing more to reduce them. Why so few growth scans? Why so few Doppler scans?