Sorry about the long post; a bit confused and could use a sounding board...
DS1 and DS2 were successfully born at home. Am hoping DC3 will also be. Have a history of miscarriage (first trimester) and also antiphospholipid syndrome so have only finally been transferred to midwife (from doctors) at about 34 weeks. First actual appt with midwife (36 + 2) and apparently baby is breech. Am spending the week trying to turn her naturally :) If that doesn't work, I have appt with midwife on tuesday when i think she will try/organise ecv if baby hasn't turned. I unfortunately seem to have read a load of horror stories about ECV in the last few days.
I'd rather have a home birth still, but my risk factors are stacking up (age - I'm 42; history of hemorrhage (lost 3litres of blood after one miscarriage); my babies generally go late (DC1 41+3 and DC2 41+6) which they don't like in older mothers, antiphospholipid syndrome (though i'm not concerned about this one), and now baby potentially breech still. I can still insist on a HB, even with breech, but i'm not sure that's sensible. My HB midwife has said she can 'find someone' with breech experience for the HB, but basically has said that a generation of midwives / docs have no breech experience as for so long they've just gone automatically to CS.
If baby turns I'll happily still go with HB. ECV may turn baby, but i've got the willies a bit having read some of the ecv threads on mumsnet. I've also got a mildly arcuate uterus, which is a factor against ECV, though i don't know how much 'mildly' affects this, and am waiting to hear back from midwife.
Anyone have actual experience? Did your baby turn after 36 weeks without ECV? Did you have a good ECV experience? Did you have a home birth with known breech? Do you have an arcuate uterus and still, or not, have ECV? No need to 'warn' me to get a CS please unless you've got experience.