I've been mulling this over recently as DS just turned one. My waters broke at five-thirty in the evening, contractions started an hour or so later, coming every five minutes. I went from 3 to 10 cm in 90 minutes and started pushing. At around nine-ish DS was diagnosed as a brow presentation, the chief consultant was fetched and I was put under for an EMCS with GA. This is where the timings get hazy. I know DS was born at ten to midnight, but what I can't work out is whether he would have likely been born earlier if he hadn't been brow. Would the CS have speeded things up, or given the speed of dilation (for a first baby) would the pushing stage likely have been just as quick?
It's not particularly important, I was just wondering whether DS would have had the same birthday had he not been brow.