Thanks for replying both, and thanks comeaway for those links. I couldn't get the first link to work, but the second one I worked out to be a risk of 17.3%, which of course means 83.7% of NOT developing praevia with accreta after one previous CS.
I requested my CS. I had coccydynia after the birth of dd1 in 2009 and I was terrified of going through that pain again - or making it even worse. I could have birthed dd2 vaginally, but I knew there was a higher risk of me hurting my back again. So, I chose the.morr predictable risks of ELCS. So far, so goos. Until now I am broody for another baby and am seriously worried about the long-term implication & consequences of CS delivery (want specially one that I requested. Guilt is never a welcome addition).
I found everything about the ELCS preferable. I had an episiotomy with dd1 and actually found the abdominal wound from the CS more tolerable. Healing was predictable; I had no agonising back pain. I could lift dd2 from the minute I was mobile again.
Yet, I remember how vulnerable I felt after the CS and there is a part of me that just doesn't want to feel that way again.
I forgot to mention here that neither of my babies were easily conceived: dd1 naturally after 9m and dd2 two years and 6 cycles of clomid.
What if we tried and I couldnt get pg?
What if I got pg and had another ELCS? I don't think I would feel safe with a VBAC.
What if I got pg and developed an awful complication because of the previous cs I requested?
My pp appearance worry of an overhang would be the least of my concerns ...
FWIW, comeaway, I've heard that an EMCS differs greatly from an ELCS. You had no choice in the matter. I think my mind would rest more easily because of this, and the fact that you are ttc #2. For me, I'm worrying because I chose to have the first CS: all subsequent consequences (if any) are ON ME. Also, we have 2 dcs, who I am delighted with. Sometimes it feels like ttc a third would be an indulgence, iyswim?