I've had 2 straightforward short labours (ds1 and ds3), 1 also thankfully short but back to back and horribly painful labour (ds2) and a horrendous C-section (ds4). Completely terrified of needing another C-section.
I keep reading on mumsnet about women saying their experience of C-section were brilliant and some people choosing CS over VB. I'm just wondering why my experience was so horrendous and other people's not. I didn't have any medical complications, although DS4 was taken to NICU when he was about 1/2 hour old and although it was technically an EMCS it was a category 3 so not rushed, I just got done before the mums having ELCS. Spinal going in was ok but I hated the rest of it, not being able to move, the shaking, not being able to see DS properly, being heaved around afterwards like a beached whale and the horrendous pain when the spinal wore off.
Really hoping to avoid a C-section next time but can someone reassure me that I could get one of those nice relaxing C-sections that I've heard about. I'm beginning to think that to have a nice relaxing C-section you have to be comparing it to a horrible VB with a 5 day induction and a 4th degree tear. Maybe my C-section was so awful because I'm comparing it to my VB's which weren't that bad.