Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Childbirth

Share experiences and get support around labour, birth and recovery.

Stats on c sections?

2 replies

louloutheshamed · 29/08/2013 09:43

I have read that 1 in 4 women have cs- does anyone know if this figure is for all births or first time births?

Does anyone know how I would find out the stats for the % of emcs after a normal vaginal delivery first time round? I am interested as I have heard of a couple of these recently but I would imagine it is quite unusual?

I had a vaginal delivery with ds and was told that I would need a cs with this pg (currently 37+6) due to placenta praevia but placenta has now moved so am set for a vaginal delivery again but have been told if I go into labour before 39 weeks then there is a higher chance of me needing emcs, so this Is playing on my mind a bit.

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
RedToothBrush · 29/08/2013 18:49

The figure you generally see is for all births not first time births.

The rate in the UK is around 24-25% of all births.

But that figure in itself is somewhat misleading. If you start to factor in that first time mothers are more likely to need a CS, women over 35 are more likely to need a CS and obese women are more likely to need a CS than the 'average' mythical woman, then that figure of 25% starts to look very different.

Instead, if you are in a lower risk group (such as having already had a child by vb successfully) that figure of 25% looks high and the reality is your chances are much lower than it seems to suggest.

On the flip side of that, if you are in a higher risk group that figure could lead you into something of a false sense of security in believing that you have only a 1 in 4 chance of having a CS when in reality that risk is much higher with your personal set of circumstances. (For women over 35 for example it can be closer to a 1/3 of all women)

So in answer to your question, needing a CS after a normal VB would probably tend to be a lot more unusual that that stat of 25% would initially suggest. If your body has proved it can give birth via VB than you have a much better chance of achieving that a second time.

So if you have some sort of complication then you really are on the unlucky side.

Billy11 · 04/09/2013 23:39

Ihad one natural. Then elcs. Now having another elcs. I think the way women and theyre lifestyles are evolving childbirth isnt that natural anymore? We are having them older. We are busier. Eating less natural foods.
I twisted my pelvic joints, broke my tailbone and had lasting damage to my knees and sacrialluc joints after the so called natural birth. After my csection i healed in three weeks. Was on a plain in six

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread