I don't know if I'm posting this in the right place, but here it goes. My son will be four at the end of august and because he is due to start school in September (he'll be the youngest in the year) I've been going over and over the circumstances of his birth. I especially feel guilty because, perhaps, if I'd done things differently he might have been born in September instead and would be at home for another year.
My ds was due on the 31st August. When I was 39 weeks, I started to leak amniotic fluid. Sometimes it was a trickle and sometimes it was a little gush. I remember having to wear a pad, sometimes it was damp and sometimes it was heavy. It was definitely not wee and it wasn't all the time. This happened over several days (on and off), and when I told my community midwife she said I needed to go into hospital and be induced. Being my first pregnancy I didn't question this at all.
I was induced with a drip and it all went horribly wrong and ended up having an EMCS. My notes read that I was induced because of PROM, but I remember having to have my waters broken during labour. Perhaps it was just my hindwaters that were leaking and I've read these can be replenished?
I'm so pleased to have a happy and healthy son but I can't help but think, did I need to be induced? Is this normal procedure? Should I have asked to be monitored instead?