Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Childbirth

Share experiences and get support around labour, birth and recovery.

episiotomy or tear - which is best?

8 replies

justlemonade · 30/05/2012 21:05

I've just read in my birth plan section of my notes I might want to consider whether I have an episiotomy or tear. With my first birth I had an episiotomy. But given a choice, which is best? For them to cut you or you to tear naturally?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Lunarlyte · 30/05/2012 22:00

Well, it depends. Episiotomies aren't done routinely anymore as there is no evidence that they prevent the more significant tears. They're really only done for a purpose, such as for some assisted deliveries (as deemed necessary) or to enlarge the vaginal opening when baby needs to come out quickly.

I suppose then, that a natural tear is preferable. With an episiotomy, you'll definitely have the equivalent of a second degree tear I.e. Skin and muscle will be cut: you will have a deep cut to heal from.

That said, being a minor surgical procedure means that there will be a degree of control to the cut and you should be able to be sewn back to heal 'as you were' IYSWIM.

I guess the best thing to hope for (if you have to tear at all) is a 'graze', where just the skin of the perenium tears. Eitherway, you'd be guided by the midwives, so get them to inform you of your options at the time.

HTH!

justlemonade · 30/05/2012 23:23

It does help thanks. It also explains why I had an episiotomy done in my first delivery. Up to now I've been ignorant as to why they went down that route.

OP posts:
MrsPaynie · 31/05/2012 18:33

I had an episiotomy with my first as I had a ventouse delivery. Then with my second, natural delivery, I had a tear along when the previous cut was. In my experience the year was much less painful when going to the toilet afterward, and healed a lot quicker for me.

justlemonade · 01/06/2012 18:41

Ok. I'm hoping for a non-assisted birth second time round so tearing is the preferable option.

OP posts:
piratecat · 01/06/2012 18:42

wish i had been cut. i tore sooo much, and in places i didn't think you could, ie labia and above.

notcitrus · 01/06/2012 19:22

I've had both twice, first time epi was to speed ds getting out but I tore a bit, second the epi was to stop me tearing any more. But I think key is to insist on an expert to do the stitches and take their time, as I recovered really quickly and only discovered I'd had a 2nd degree perianal tear this time when I read my notes 4 days later, and DP confirmed it was the case!

Chubfuddler · 01/06/2012 19:23

I wish mw had cut me. She hesitated because I think they are very reluctant to cut, and I tore so badly next delivery had to be elcs.

ShhhhhGoBackToSleep · 01/06/2012 19:28

It is generally better to tear, even if they do an episiotomy to try to prevent bad tearing, the epi itself can then tear further anyway.

I would only consent to an episiotomy if I needed another assisted delivery, or if the baby was in distress and needed to come out straightaway. Otherwise, a tear would be likely to be less severe than an episiotomy and heal better.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread