I'm 40+13 (officially, but 40+8 by my dates), today (second pregnancy) so I won't have any midwife on call cover after tomorrow. I'm due to have a midwife appt at some point today to have another sweep done (had one on Mon, no joy), and I just know that she is going to tell me that cover won't be extended beyond the 40+14.
Am I still entitled to have midwife cover for a homebirth if I chose to go beyond the recommended dates?
Has anyone else been in a similar situation? and what have you done?
The thing is I don't believe the nhs due date is correct. Had long discussion on Tues with consultant about it, as they recommend induction at 40+12, which I declined. They say edd is 12th, I say 17th (I was charting bbt when we were ttc, so I know exactly when I ovulated. Scan date suggests I conceived before I even ovulated). But they won't budge from the official due date (even though my evidence is factual - v annoying!), which puts my home birth plans in jeopardy unless I go into labour this minute (which unfortunately doesn't seem like it's going to happen).
Also, does anyone know if I go post-dates and I cannot have the home birth whether the MLU would take me when I finally go into labour or is it straight to the CLU because I'd be past 40+14 (officially) at that stage?
I really want to avoid CLU as that is where I had to go when DD was born, and had the usual constant monitoring (meconium in waters), lying on bed for 10 hrs, augmentation, episiotomy etc etc- obviously not what I was hoping for. I can't understand what's taking this baby so long. I wish he/she would just hurry up and get here, and save me all this stress! DD was born at 40+4. I thought subsequent pregnancies should be shorter!
Anyway back to the original dilemma re home birth "entitlements" post dates, any advice gratefully received!