Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Childbirth

Share experiences and get support around labour, birth and recovery.

VBAC after 2 c sections

6 replies

Shez1981 · 21/05/2012 11:36

Im looking for some advice on having a vbac after 2 c sections. After 2 c sections i would love a normal birth with my 3rd baby (when i fall) but not sure if it a good idea. Can anyone give me any advice.

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
boston84 · 21/05/2012 11:51

I am expecting my 3rd after 2 csections. I have been wondering the same. Not had consultant's appointment but believe I will be advised to have another csection. Even states this on my notes that a csection is better if you have had 2 csections.

Shez1981 · 21/05/2012 21:13

Iv heard that it ment to be safer but also of a lady who had a normal birth after 5 c sections

OP posts:
DameHermione · 21/05/2012 21:16

Look at the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist (RCOG) green top guidelunes.

They state there is not an increased risk of scar rupture after 2 cs.

Chances of success depend on why you had the first 2.

And check what your hospital guidelines say.

PipFEH · 21/05/2012 21:22

My consultant was happy to let me try a vbac after 2 sections (1 emergency, 1 elective with complications). I thought a lot about it, but the decision was taken out of my hands when ds2 was breach, and I had a blissfully uneventful elective - third time lucky. I wouldn't say it was necessarily safer - it depends on how your consultant and how you personally interpret the stats. And you have to really want it I think. I've always been very on edge about uterine rupture, which is why I chose an elective second time - it was pretty awful, so I considered vbac third time. I honestly still have no idea what I'd have done if he'd been the right way up!

boston84 · 21/05/2012 21:34

I tried for a VBAC last time but got to about 8-9 cms before having a section due to failure to progress. Baby's head wasn't really coming down.
his makes me think that a csection is probably for the best as I am quite short but have quite big babies.

giggles123 · 15/06/2012 19:39

Re:Boston84
Did u have an epidural with no 3?
I am quite short with a narrowish pelvis so really interested in what you have to say.
Thanks for posting. I am keen to try a vbac after 2 sections. My 1st was 8lb and the 2nd 9lb. I dilated to 7cm both times but contractions were not very strong and I was told my only option was a c-section due to failure to progress. (Now I know it wasn't). They just did not want to take any risks incase it got unpleasant. My previous 2 did not engage in the pelvis at 7cm dilated. I now know that babies can engage at the very last minute. So again, another incomplete truth that I was told in the labour room. I am now 30wks preggers with no 3 and trying to get my vbac. They'll be seeing me again in 4 weeks but already say that its not going to be a small baby this time. I want to refuse any kind of intervention until the last minute. I believe that the epidurals I had slowed things down so I am trying to avoid it this time. They don't like my choice and have asked me to think about it some more. I really want a vbac as I plan to have baby no 4.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread