Five years to the term breech trial: The rise and fall of a randomized
controlled trial.
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 194(1):20-25, January 2006.
Glezerman, Marek MD
Abstract:
Objective: On the basis of the end points of neonatal morbidity and
death, the authors of the term breech trial concluded unequivocally that
cesarean delivery was safer for breech babies.
Study design: Analysis of the original and new data gives rise to
serious concerns as far as study design, methods, and conclusions are
concerned. In a substantial number of cases, there was a lack of
adherence to the inclusion criteria. There was a large
interinstitutional variation of standard of care; inadequate methods of
antepartum and intrapartum fetal assessment were used, and a large
proportion of women were recruited during active labor. In many
instances of planned vaginal delivery, there was no attendance of a
clinician with adequate expertise.
Results: Most cases of neonatal death and morbidity in the term breech
trial cannot be attributed to the mode of delivery. Moreover, analysis
of outcome after 2 years has shown no difference between vaginal and
abdominal deliveries of breech babies.
Conclusion: The original term breech trial recommendations should be
withdrawn.
----
This is real research (many knew the original was flawed so it's good that it is recognised by US obstetricians - who are quite section happy! - .... when will practice change who knows???? But quite possibly a lot of damage has been done