I really really wanted a waterbirth with ds, but by the time we got to hospital were told there wasn't time to fill the pool (they were probably right, it was less than 1.5 hours from our arrival when he was born). I had a great birth with him, but I really want to try and get into the water this time. But 2 things are playing on my mind. First, do they let you in if your waters have already gone? I seem to remember the advice is to stay out of the bath if your waters have gone because of the risk of infection? Both previous labours have started with my waters going as the first sign of labour. And the second worry is a bigger one. My ds had a very short cord when he was born, they had to cut it immediately just to be able to pass him up to me, and the midwife commented it was one fo the shortest she'd seen. I have no reason to think that will happen again (do I??) but it worries me what would happen if this was the case when baby was underwater. Would the midwife have to clamber in and cut the cord? The final thing I'm wondering is if, because of the speed of my last labour (3.5 hours) I should ask them to fill up the pool when I ring and tell them we're on our way in. Will they think I'm being ludicrous? With my ds, and I assume it's still the same system, a community midwife comes out to assess you when you first ring the labour ward to say you're in labour, I suppose to save you a wasted journey to hospital if you're not actually in active labour. So assuming I'm given the go ahead, shall I just ask them to prepare for a waterbirth so I'm not waiting for it to be filled up?