I don't really use this nickname, but wanted to be a bit anonymous for this and some people know me in real life...
I have seen a few threads recently about forceps, which are often very strongly debated. It has got me thinking about my own forceps delivery a few years ago. I can't work out whether what I had was low forceps or Keillands, and don't recall being told at the time. I am wondering if I post some details whether anyone will be able to hazard a guess...
My DD was OP and I ended up on the drip with a very strong epidural. When it came to pushing, DD was distressed and needed to come out fairly quickly. I pushed for an hour, but couldn't get her 'round the U bend' as the midwife put it. The registrar originally said he was going to use ventouse, but at the last minute decided that he couldn't quite get a good enough grip and didn't want to waste time. He said he would rather do forceps in the delivery room, as he was sure it would be a straightforward forceps delivery and that would avoid needing to go down to theatre and prep for a possible section.
Does that sound like it was likely to be low forceps?
I know I could probably get my medical records, etc, but I've had other children since and, well, it seems a lot of hassle for what is essentially curiosity.