I've been hoping for a VBAC throughout this pregnancy. I had ELCS with DD1 as she was breech. I'm now 40+6 and have an appointment tomorrow to discuss what happens if I don't go into labour - CS vs Induction (I will be refusing induction as I think the risks are too high). But now I'm in a dilemma as I'm sure that if I wanted (or even if I don't) I'll be offered a CS at the end of this week - 41+2, or the start of next - 41+6.
On the one hand, I'm keen to push CS back to 42+3 to give my body as long a time as possible to go into labour and hopefully have a VBAC. But I'm not sure I am making the right choice. As I understand it, a CS after 39 weeks has very very little risk for the baby, although a low-medium risk to the mum. Whereas VBAC or indeed any vaginal birth has considerably more risks to the baby - low risks, but a wide spread of things that can go wrong during birth. So I am essentially pushing the risk off me onto the baby by opting for VBAC. It all seemed so sensible before I was overdue, but now (I think) I will be offered a CS on a plate, I wonder whether I am allowing my fear and wish to not have another section to cloud my judgement. Am I being selfish by trying for a VBAC?
My best hope is that I go into labour in the next couple of days then I won't need to make this decision. I'm having another sweep attempt on Wednesday but two tries so far have found my cervix still posterior although baby is 2/5 engaged. Aargh!